Wouters A V
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Med Care. 1990 Jul;28(7):573-85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00004.
This report is a case study analysis of the relative costs of preferred provider organization (PPO) and non-PPO managed episodes. Results indicate that the episode costs of PPO providers are not significantly different from the episode costs of non-PPO providers for general acute primary outpatient health care. PPO provider episode costs were 3.12% higher for acute upper respiratory illness. Higher PPO physician charges of 10-16% appear to be the main reason for relatively higher PPO episode costs. For general primary health care, drug charges are 23% higher in PPO episodes than in non-PPO episodes. Higher physician and drug charges are partially compensated for by diagnostic charges, which are 14-18% lower in PPO-managed episodes. In light of these findings and the cost-sharing arrangement with the PPO, it is likely that the employer/insurer plan paid expenditures for outpatient care will increase, contrary to expectations.
本报告是对优选提供者组织(PPO)和非PPO管理的诊疗费用相对成本的案例研究分析。结果表明,对于一般急性初级门诊医疗保健,PPO提供者的诊疗费用与非PPO提供者的诊疗费用没有显著差异。急性上呼吸道疾病的PPO提供者诊疗费用高出3.12%。PPO医生收费高出10 - 16%似乎是PPO诊疗费用相对较高的主要原因。对于一般初级医疗保健,PPO诊疗中的药品费用比非PPO诊疗高出23%。较高的医生和药品费用部分被诊断费用所抵消,在PPO管理的诊疗中诊断费用低14 - 18%。鉴于这些发现以及与PPO的成本分摊安排,雇主/保险公司计划支付的门诊护理费用可能会增加,这与预期相反。