Cave D G
Managed Care Research Division, Hewitt Associates, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Med Care. 1995 May;33(5):463-86. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199505000-00003.
Health plans and providers need to profile current practice patterns to understand better the resources used in managing medical conditions. A profiling system is presented that groups International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) codes into 125 diagnostic clusters based on clinical homogeneity with respect to physician treatment response. For each diagnostic cluster, diagnostic episode clusters (DECs) are formulated. A DEC links all services incurred in treating a patient's medical condition within a specific period of time. Each DEC is marked with a severity-of-illness, comorbidity, and age indicator. To test the validity of the diagnostic cluster methodology, claims were analyzed from a preferred provider organization (PPO) and an independent practice association (IPA). PPO and IPA DEC charges and utilization were compared with t-tests. Physician practice patterns differed based on patient severity of illness, comorbidities, and age. Both PPO and IPA physicians delivered significantly more resources to patients in higher severity-of-illness categories. PPO physicians generally treated older patients with more resources than younger patients. Patient age did not have the same impact on IPA physicians' practice patterns. IPA physicians' average treatment pattern was about 22% less expensive than that of PPO physicians. IPA physicians decreased average expenses by reducing hospital days by about 73% (P < 0.01) and hospital outpatient visits by about 89% (P < 0.01) compared to the rates of PPO physicians. Ambulatory services among IPA physicians were not significantly higher than rates for PPO physicians. The DEC methodology is a valid approach for profiling patterns of treatment. The style of medicine in the IPA was less hospital intensive and, consequently, less expensive than that practiced by PPO physicians. PPO physicians also had greater practice pattern variations than IPA physicians.
健康计划和医疗服务提供者需要剖析当前的医疗实践模式,以便更好地了解管理医疗状况所使用的资源。本文介绍了一种剖析系统,该系统根据医生治疗反应的临床同质性,将国际疾病分类(ICD-9-CM)代码分组为125个诊断集群。对于每个诊断集群,制定诊断事件集群(DEC)。DEC链接在特定时间段内治疗患者医疗状况所产生的所有服务。每个DEC都标有疾病严重程度、合并症和年龄指标。为了测试诊断集群方法的有效性,对一家优选提供者组织(PPO)和一个独立执业协会(IPA)的理赔数据进行了分析。使用t检验比较了PPO和IPA的DEC费用及利用率。医生的医疗实践模式因患者的疾病严重程度、合并症和年龄而异。PPO和IPA的医生都为病情较重的患者提供了明显更多的资源。PPO医生通常为老年患者提供比年轻患者更多的资源。患者年龄对IPA医生的医疗实践模式没有相同的影响。IPA医生的平均治疗模式比PPO医生便宜约22%。与PPO医生相比,IPA医生通过将住院天数减少约73%(P<0.01)和门诊就诊次数减少约89%(P<0.01)来降低平均费用。IPA医生的门诊服务率并不显著高于PPO医生。DEC方法是一种有效的剖析治疗模式的方法。IPA的医疗风格对医院的依赖程度较低,因此,比PPO医生的医疗风格成本更低。PPO医生的医疗实践模式差异也比IPA医生更大。