Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, Building 08.2, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark,
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):220-41. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9437-x.
This paper presents results from a Campbell systematic review on the nature and effectiveness of workplace disability management programs (WPDM) promoting return to work (RTW), as implemented and practiced by employers. A classification of WPDM program components, based on the review results, is proposed.
Twelve databases were searched between 1948 to July 2010 for peer-reviewed studies of WPDM programs provided by employers to re-entering workers with occupational or non-occupational illnesses or injuries. Screening of articles, risk of bias assessment and data extraction were conducted in pairs of reviewers. Studies were clustered around various dimensions of the design and context of programs.
16,932 records were identified by the initial search. 599 papers were assessed for relevance. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Twelve peer reviewed articles (two non-randomized studies, and ten single group experimental before and after studies), including ten different WPDM programs informed the synthesis of results. Narrative descriptions of the included program characteristics provided insight on program scope, components, procedures and human resources involved. However, there were insufficient data on the characteristics of the sample and the effect sizes were uncertain. A taxonomy classifying policies and practices around WPDM programs is proposed.
There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of employer provided WPDM programs promoting RTW. It was not possible to determine if specific program components or specific sets of components are driving effectiveness. The proposed taxonomy may guide future WPDM program evaluation and clarify the setup of programs offered to identify gaps in existing company strategies.
本文呈现了一项坎贝尔系统综述的结果,该综述考察了雇主实施和实践的促进重返工作岗位(RTW)的工作场所残疾管理计划(WPDM)的性质和效果。根据综述结果,提出了 WPDM 计划组件的分类。
在 1948 年至 2010 年 7 月期间,从 12 个数据库中搜索了雇主为患有职业或非职业疾病或伤害的重新上岗工人提供的 WPDM 计划的同行评审研究。由两位评审员对文章进行筛选、偏倚风险评估和数据提取。研究围绕着方案设计和背景的各种维度进行了聚类。
初步搜索确定了 16932 条记录。有 599 篇论文被评估为相关。符合纳入标准的有 13 项研究。12 篇同行评议文章(两项非随机研究,以及 10 项单组实验前后研究),包括 10 个不同的 WPDM 计划,为结果综合提供了信息。纳入的计划特征的叙述性描述提供了对计划范围、组成部分、程序和涉及的人力资源的深入了解。然而,关于样本特征和效果大小的数据不足。提出了一个分类法,对 WPDM 计划的政策和实践进行分类。
没有足够的证据来得出关于促进 RTW 的雇主提供的 WPDM 计划的有效性的结论。无法确定特定的计划组件或特定的组件集是否是推动效果的因素。所提出的分类法可以指导未来的 WPDM 计划评估,并阐明提供的计划设置,以确定现有公司策略中的差距。