Suppr超能文献

基于化学分析的附子炮制方法合理性研究

[Rationality of the processing methods of aconiti lateralis radix (Fuzi) based on chemical analysis].

作者信息

Wen Rui-Qing, Li Dong-Hui, Zhao Xin, Wang Jia-Bo, Zhao Yan-Ling, Zhang Ping, Sun Zhi-Yong, Yan Dan, Xiao Xiao-He, Ren Yu-Zhen, Li Fei, Du Jie, Zhou Hai-Yan

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China.

出版信息

Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2013 Feb;48(2):286-90.

Abstract

In this study, we explored the rationality of processing methods and mechanism of Aconiti Lateralis Radix (Fuzi) through comparing the chemical contents of diester alkaloids (DAs) and monoester alkaloids (MAs) in the raw material of Fuzi and its processed products. The results showed that the toxicity potency of MAs is at least lower than 1/64 to 1/180 of the toxicity potency of DAs. The contents of DAs in processed Fuzi decreased to 1/76.5 to 1/38.3 of the value of raw Fuzi. The contents of MAs in processed Fuzi significantly increased by 4.6 to 5.2 fold or basically the same as that of the raw Fuzi. The values of MAs/DAs of processed Fuzi were enhanced by 30 to 390 fold of the raw Fuzi. It was found that the contents of DAs were insignificantly different between "Wu dan fu pian" (steaming or stir-frying without Danba) and "Dan fu pian" (steaming or stir-frying with Danba). The result suggested that the abilities of "eliminating toxicity" of different processing methods were equivalent at all. In contrast, the contents of MAs contained in "Wu dan fu pian" were of 5.3 to 8.7 fold higher than the values in "Dan fu pian". This result suggested the processing method by steaming or stir-frying without Danba might have better effect for "conserving property" than the method processed with Danba stipulated by China Pharmacopoeia. We believe that the new processing method without Danba can be recommended in further application due to it offers a simple procedure and it will not introduce inorganic impurities in the products.

摘要

本研究通过比较附子原料及其炮制品中双酯型生物碱(DAs)和单酯型生物碱(MAs)的化学含量,探讨了附子炮制方法的合理性及其机制。结果表明,MAs的毒性效力至少比DAs的毒性效力低1/64至1/180。炮制附子中DAs的含量降至生附子含量的1/76.5至1/38.3。炮制附子中MAs的含量显著增加了4.6至5.2倍,或与生附子基本相同。炮制附子中MAs/DAs的值比生附子提高了30至390倍。结果发现,“无胆附片”(不胆巴蒸或炒)和“胆附片”(胆巴蒸或炒)中DAs的含量无显著差异。结果表明,不同炮制方法的“解毒”能力完全相同。相比之下,“无胆附片”中所含MAs的含量比“胆附片”中的值高5.3至8.7倍。该结果表明,不胆巴蒸或炒的炮制方法可能比《中国药典》规定的胆巴炮制方法具有更好的“存性”效果。我们认为,由于无胆巴新炮制方法操作简单且不会在产品中引入无机杂质,因此在进一步应用中可推荐使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验