Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Gastroenterology. 2013 Aug;145(2):312-9.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 11.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although patients with Barrett's esophagus commonly undergo endoscopic surveillance, its effectiveness in reducing mortality from esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas has not been evaluated rigorously.
We performed a case-control study in a community-based setting. Among 8272 members with Barrett's esophagus, we identified 351 esophageal adenocarcinoma: 70 in persons who had a prior diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (who were eligible for surveillance); 51 of these patients died, 38 as a result of the cancers (cases). Surveillance histories were contrasted with a sample of 101 living persons with Barrett's esophagus (controls), matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up evaluation.
Surveillance within 3 years was not associated with a decreased risk of death from esophageal adenocarcinoma (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-2.75). Fatal cases were nearly as likely to have received surveillance (55.3%) as were controls (60.4%). A Barrett's esophagus length longer than 3 cm and prior dysplasia each were associated with subsequent mortality, but adjustment for these did not change the main findings. Although all patients should be included in evaluations of effectiveness, excluding deaths related to cancer treatment and patients who failed to complete treatment, changed the magnitude, but not the significance, of the association (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.64).
Endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus was not associated with a substantially decreased risk of death from esophageal adenocarcinoma. The results do not exclude a small to moderate benefit. However, if such a benefit exists, our findings indicate that it is substantially smaller than currently estimated. The effectiveness of surveillance was influenced partially by the acceptability of existing treatments and the occurrence of treatment-associated mortality.
尽管 Barrett 食管患者通常会接受内镜监测,但尚未严格评估其降低食管/胃食管交界处腺癌死亡率的效果。
我们在社区环境中进行了一项病例对照研究。在 8272 名 Barrett 食管患者中,我们发现了 351 例食管腺癌:70 例发生在有 Barrett 食管既往诊断的患者中(有监测资格);其中 51 例患者死亡,38 例死于癌症(病例)。将监测史与 101 名存活的 Barrett 食管患者(对照)进行对比,这些患者按年龄、性别和随访评估时间匹配。
3 年内进行监测与降低食管腺癌死亡风险无关(调整后的优势比,0.99;95%置信区间,0.36-2.75)。致命病例接受监测的可能性与对照相似(55.3% vs. 60.4%)。Barrett 食管长度大于 3cm 和先前存在异型增生与随后的死亡率相关,但调整这些因素并未改变主要发现。虽然所有患者都应纳入有效性评估,但排除与癌症治疗相关的死亡和未完成治疗的患者,改变了相关性的幅度(优势比,0.46;95%置信区间,0.13-1.64),但没有改变其意义。
对 Barrett 食管患者进行内镜监测与降低食管腺癌死亡风险无显著相关性。结果并不排除存在小到中度益处的可能性。然而,如果确实存在这种益处,我们的研究结果表明其远远小于目前的估计。监测的有效性部分受到现有治疗方法的可接受性和治疗相关死亡率的影响。