• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰自行车骑行者冒险行为中的性别差异。

Sex differences in risk taking behavior among Dutch cyclists.

作者信息

Cobey Kelly D, Stulp Gert, Laan Freek, Buunk Abraham P, Pollet Thomas V

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2013 May 14;11(2):350-64. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100206.

DOI:10.1177/147470491301100206
PMID:23674522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10426911/
Abstract

The majority of research examining sex differences in risk-taking behavior focuses on overt physical risk measures in which failed risk attempts may result in serious injury or death. The present research describes sex differences in patterns of risk taking in day-to-day behavior among Dutch cyclists. Through three observational studies we test sex differences in risk taking in situations of financial risk (fines for failing to use bike lights, Study 1), theft risk (bike locking behavior, Study 2) as well as physical risk (risky maneuvers, Study 3). Results corroborate previous findings by showing that across these domains men are more inclined to take risks than women. We discuss how these findings might be used in an applied context.

摘要

大多数研究冒险行为性别差异的研究都集中在明显的身体风险测量上,在这些测量中,冒险尝试失败可能会导致严重伤害或死亡。本研究描述了荷兰自行车骑行者日常行为中冒险模式的性别差异。通过三项观察性研究,我们测试了在财务风险(未使用自行车灯被罚款,研究1)、盗窃风险(自行车锁车行为,研究2)以及身体风险(危险动作,研究3)情况下的冒险行为性别差异。结果证实了先前的研究发现,表明在这些领域中,男性比女性更倾向于冒险。我们讨论了这些发现如何在实际应用中使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/fc46431fb95d/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/2e44c830563d/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/ba9f9dca44a6/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/8c6c70cc7634/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/008842adbcb4/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/ad1f71dba62c/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/d1be1f33a542/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/fc46431fb95d/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/2e44c830563d/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/ba9f9dca44a6/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/8c6c70cc7634/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/008842adbcb4/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/ad1f71dba62c/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/d1be1f33a542/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03ff/10426911/fc46431fb95d/10.1177_147470491301100206-fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex differences in risk taking behavior among Dutch cyclists.荷兰自行车骑行者冒险行为中的性别差异。
Evol Psychol. 2013 May 14;11(2):350-64. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100206.
2
Are helmeted cyclists taking more risk at signalized intersections?戴头盔的自行车骑手在有信号灯的路口是否承担更大风险?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(8):552-557. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1817417. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
German bike messengers' experiences and expressions of cycling anger.德国自行车信使的骑车愤怒体验和表达。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(7):753-758. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1616179. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
4
Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders.冒险骑行:比较传统自行车骑手和电动自行车骑手安全行为的自然主义方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Sep;82:220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
Red-light running behavior of cyclists in Italy: An observational study.意大利自行车闯红灯行为:一项观察性研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:219-232. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Does gender really matter? A structural equation model to explain risky and positive cycling behaviors.性别真的重要吗?一个解释风险和积极循环行为的结构方程模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
7
Personal and trip characteristics associated with safety equipment use by injured adult bicyclists: a cross-sectional study.与受伤成年自行车骑手使用安全设备相关的个人和行程特征:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 11;12:765. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-765.
8
E-bikers' braking behavior: Results from a naturalistic cycling study.电动自行车骑行者的制动行为:自然骑行研究的结果。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup3):62-67. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1643015. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
9
Speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on e-bikes in simple and complex traffic situations: a field experiment.电动自行车老年人在简单和复杂交通情况下的速度选择和精神负荷:现场实验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jan;74:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
10
Social environment versus cycling competency predicting risk-taking in 11- to 13-year-old cyclists in The Netherlands.社会环境与骑行能力对荷兰 11 至 13 岁自行车手冒险行为的预测作用。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup3):27-32. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1613533. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Differences in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices toward COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯对新冠病毒病的认知、态度和行为的性别差异:一项横断面研究
Diseases. 2023 Apr 19;11(2):63. doi: 10.3390/diseases11020063.
2
Preference for Male Risk Takers Varies with Relationship Context and Health Status but not COVID Risk.对男性冒险者的偏好因关系背景和健康状况而异,与新冠风险无关。
Evol Psychol Sci. 2023 Feb 22:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3.
3
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of the General Population in Yemen Regarding COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Who dares, wins : Heroism versus altruism in women's mate choice.勇者胜:女性择偶中的英雄主义与利他主义
Hum Nat. 2001 Jun;12(2):89-105. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1018-6.
2
Human male pair bonding and testosterone.人类男性的伴侣关系与睾酮
Hum Nat. 2004 Jun;15(2):119-31. doi: 10.1007/s12110-004-1016-6.
3
An evolutionary perspective on health psychology: new approaches and applications.健康心理学的进化视角:新方法与应用
也门普通民众对新冠病毒的认知、态度和行为:一项横断面研究。
Diseases. 2023 Jan 26;11(1):17. doi: 10.3390/diseases11010017.
4
Effective factors of improved helmet use in motorcyclists: a systematic review.提高摩托车手头盔使用率的影响因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14893-0.
5
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of Nepalese residents in the prevention and control of COVID-19: A cross-sectional web-based survey.尼泊尔居民在新冠疫情防控方面的知识、态度与实践:一项基于网络的横断面调查。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Dec;84:104861. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104861. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
6
Training effect on sex-based differences in components of the Shepard and Metzler mental rotation task.训练对 Shepard 和 Metzler 心理旋转任务成分中性别差异的影响。
J Physiol Anthropol. 2022 Nov 11;41(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40101-022-00314-z.
7
Indonesian Ulema Council Fatwa on Religious Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Investigation of Muslim Attitudes and Practices.印度尼西亚乌里玛理事会关于 COVID-19 大流行期间宗教活动的教法:对穆斯林态度和实践的调查。
J Relig Health. 2023 Feb;62(1):627-649. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01639-w. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
8
Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours toward COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey among Nigerian University students.尼日利亚大学生对新型冠状病毒肺炎的认知、态度和行为:一项横断面调查
Health SA. 2022 May 27;27:1725. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1725. eCollection 2022.
9
Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 among secondary school students in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔镇中学生对 COVID-19 的知识、态度和实践。
PLoS One. 2022 May 23;17(5):e0268084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268084. eCollection 2022.
10
What Has Changed in the Behaviors of the Public After the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional Study From the Saudi Community Perspective.新冠疫情后公众行为有何变化?沙特社区视角的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;10:723229. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.723229. eCollection 2022.
Evol Psychol. 2012 Dec 20;10(5):855-67. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000508.
4
Is the political animal politically ignorant? Applying evolutionary psychology to the study of political attitudes.政治动物在政治方面无知吗?将进化心理学应用于政治态度研究。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Dec 20;10(5):802-17. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000504.
5
Evolutionary psychology in the modern world: applications, perspectives, and strategies.现代世界中的进化心理学:应用、视角与策略。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Dec 20;10(5):762-9. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000501.
6
Testosterone levels and their associations with lifetime number of opposite sex partners and remarriage in a large sample of American elderly men and women.在一个大型的美国老年男女样本中,检测睾固酮水平及其与异性伴侣数量和再婚的关联。
Horm Behav. 2011 Jun;60(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
7
Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila.果蝇的同性选择
Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1948.21.
8
A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection.对贝特曼关于同性选择的经典研究的重新评估。
Evolution. 2007 Nov;61(11):2457-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00212.x. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
9
Assortative mating for cigarette smoking and for alcohol consumption in female Australian twins and their spouses.澳大利亚女性双胞胎及其配偶在吸烟和饮酒方面的选型交配。
Behav Genet. 2006 Jul;36(4):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s10519-006-9081-8. Epub 2006 May 19.
10
Risky driving and lifestyles in adolescence.青少年时期的危险驾驶与生活方式。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 May;38(3):472-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 20.