SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, PO Box 93113, 2509 AC The Hague, The Netherlands.
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, PO Box 93113, 2509 AC The Hague, The Netherlands.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jan;74:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
To study the speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on electrical assisted bicycles (e-bikes) in simple and complex traffic situations compared to these on conventional bicycles, a field experiment was conducted using two instrumented bicycles. These bicycles were identical except for the electric pedal support system. Two groups were compared: elderly cyclists (65 years of age and older) and a reference group of cyclists in middle adulthood (between 30 and 45 years of age). Participants rode a fixed route with a length of approximately 3.5 km on both bicycles in counterbalanced order. The route consisted of secluded bicycle paths and roads in a residential area where cyclist have to share the road with motorized traffic. The straight sections on secluded bicycle paths were classified as simple traffic situations and the intersections in the residential area where participants had to turn left, as complex traffic situations. Speed and mental workload were measured. For the assessment of mental workload the peripheral detection task (PDT) was applied. In simple traffic situations the elderly cyclists rode an average 3.6 km/h faster on the e-bike than on the conventional bicycle. However, in complex traffic situations they rode an average only 1.7 km/h faster on the e-bike than on the conventional bicycle. Except for the fact that the cyclists in middle adulthood rode an average approximately 2.6 km/h faster on both bicycle types and in both traffic conditions, their speed patterns were very similar. The speed of the elderly cyclists on an e-bike was approximately the speed of the cyclists in middle adulthood on a conventional bicycle. For the elderly cyclist and the cyclists in middle adulthood, mental workload did not differ between bicycle type. For both groups, the mental workload was higher in complex traffic situations than in simple traffic situations. Mental workload of the elderly cyclists was somewhat higher than the mental workload of the cyclists in middle adulthood. The relatively high speed of the elderly cyclists on e-bikes in complex traffic situations and their relatively high mental workload in these situations may increase the accident risk of elderly cyclist when they ride on an e-bike.
为了研究与传统自行车相比,老年人在电动助力自行车(e-bike)上在简单和复杂交通情况下的速度选择和精神工作负荷,在使用两辆装有仪器的自行车进行了现场实验。这两辆自行车除了电动脚踏支撑系统外,其他完全相同。比较了两组:老年人(65 岁及以上)和中年人(30 至 45 岁)的参考组。参与者在两辆自行车上以相反的顺序在大约 3.5 公里的固定路线上骑行。路线包括住宅区的封闭自行车道和道路,骑自行车的人必须与机动车辆共享道路。封闭自行车道上的直线路段被归类为简单交通情况,而住宅区的交叉路口,参与者必须左转,被归类为复杂交通情况。测量速度和精神工作负荷。为了评估精神工作负荷,应用了外周检测任务(PDT)。在简单的交通情况下,老年人在 e-bike 上的平均骑行速度比传统自行车快 3.6 公里/小时。然而,在复杂的交通情况下,他们在 e-bike 上的平均骑行速度仅比传统自行车快 1.7 公里/小时。除了中年人在两种自行车类型和两种交通情况下的平均速度快约 2.6 公里/小时的事实外,他们的速度模式非常相似。老年人在 e-bike 上的速度大约是中年人在传统自行车上的速度。对于老年人和中年人来说,自行车类型之间的精神工作负荷没有差异。对于这两个群体,复杂交通情况下的精神工作负荷高于简单交通情况下的精神工作负荷。老年人自行车手的精神工作负荷略高于中年人。老年人在复杂交通情况下使用 e-bike 的相对较高的速度和在这些情况下相对较高的精神工作负荷可能会增加他们使用 e-bike 时发生事故的风险。