Infectious Disease Section, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2012;7 Suppl 1:S22-33. doi: 10.1002/jhm.988.
Shortening the duration of antimicrobial therapy is an important strategy for optimizing patient care and reducing the spread of antimicrobial resistance. It is best used in the context of an overall approach to infection management that includes a focus on selecting the right initial drug and dosing regimen for empiric therapy, and de-escalation to a more narrowly focused drug regimen (or termination) based on subsequent culture results and clinical data. In addition to reducing resistance, other potential benefits of shorter antimicrobial courses include lowered antimicrobial costs, reduced risk of superinfections (including Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea), reduced risk of antimicrobial-related organ toxicity, and improved drug compliance. There have been relatively few randomized clinical trials that study the optimal treatment durations for such serious infections as pneumonia (community- and healthcare/hospital-acquired), complicated intra-abdominal infection, and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). Nonetheless, a growing number of studies have explored the possibilities of reducing the duration of antimicrobial therapy for at least certain patients with these infections, under certain circumstances. Professional organizations have compiled these data and used them to develop clinical practice guidelines to aid clinicians in choosing optimal treatment durations for individual patients. Many patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, or healthcare-associated pneumonia can be treated for 7-8 days, while 4-7 days and 14-day treatment durations may suffice for many patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections and uncomplicated CRBSI, respectively. This article first provides a general background on the rationale and data supporting shortened courses of antimicrobial therapy, before using 3 case studies to explore the practical implications of current knowledge and treatment guidelines when making decisions about treatment duration for individual patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infection, and CRBSI.
缩短抗菌治疗疗程是优化患者治疗和减少抗菌药物耐药性传播的重要策略。它最好在感染管理的整体方法的背景下使用,该方法包括关注选择初始药物和经验性治疗的剂量方案,并根据后续培养结果和临床数据逐步降级为更窄谱的药物方案(或终止治疗)。除了降低耐药性外,缩短抗菌疗程的其他潜在益处包括降低抗菌药物成本、减少超级感染(包括艰难梭菌相关性腹泻)的风险、降低抗菌药物相关器官毒性的风险以及提高药物依从性。尽管如此,只有相对较少的随机临床试验研究了肺炎(社区获得性和医疗机构获得性)、复杂性腹腔内感染和导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)等严重感染的最佳治疗持续时间。尽管如此,越来越多的研究探索了在某些情况下为至少某些此类感染患者缩短抗菌治疗疗程的可能性。专业组织已经汇总了这些数据,并将其用于制定临床实践指南,以帮助临床医生为个体患者选择最佳的治疗持续时间。许多医院获得性肺炎、呼吸机相关性肺炎或医疗保健相关性肺炎患者可以接受 7-8 天的治疗,而许多复杂性腹腔内感染和无并发症 CRBSI 患者分别需要 4-7 天和 14 天的治疗时间。本文首先提供了缩短抗菌治疗疗程的基本原理和数据的一般背景,然后使用 3 个案例研究探讨了当前知识和治疗指南在决定医疗保健相关性肺炎、复杂性腹腔内感染和 CRBSI 患者个体治疗持续时间时的实际意义。