Cognitive Neurology Division, Neurology Department, James A Haley VA Hospital, Tampa, Florida; Cognitive Neurology Division, Roskamp Neuroscience Institute, Sarasota, Florida.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):1385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 May 13.
Aphasia is one of the most common stroke syndrome presentations, yet little is known about the spectrum of different subtypes or their stroke mechanisms. Yet, subtypes and etiology are known to influence the prognosis and recovery.
Our aim is to analyze aphasia subtypes and etiology in a large subacute stroke population.
Consecutive patients from a dedicated cognitive stroke registry were accrued. A validated cognitive screening examination was administered during the first month of stroke presentation, which enabled a diagnosis of 14 different aphasic subtypes. The evolution from one subtype to another in the acute and subacute period, at times, resulted in more than 1 subtype being diagnosed. Etiology of stroke was determined by the modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria that included intracerebral hemorrhage. Exclusions included dementia, chronic medical illness, substance abuse, and severe depression.
Of 2389 stroke patients, after exclusions (n=593), aphasias numbered 625 (625 of 1796; 34.8%), and the subtype frequencies included Broca aphasia (n=170; 27.2%), anomic aphasia (n=165; 26.4%), global aphasia (n=119; 19.04%), and subcortical aphasia (n=57; 9.12%). Less frequent subtypes (total n=40; 6.7%) included transcortical aphasia (n=11), Wernicke aphasia (n=10), conduction aphasia (n=7), aphemia (n=3), semantic aphasia (n=3), crossed aphasia (n=3), pure word deafness (n=2), and foreign accent syndrome (n=1). Aphasia subtypes and etiologies had some significant associations (chi-square: 855.8, P value<.0001). Bonferroni-adjusted P values revealed that anomic aphasia had a significant association with small-vessel disease (SVD) (odds ratio [OR]=2.0254, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3820-2.9681), and global aphasia patients mostly had cardioembolic (CE) causes (OR=2.3589, 95% CI: 1.5506-3.5885) and less likely SVD (OR=.2583, 95% CI: .1444-.4654). Other notable inferences were included. Wernicke aphasia was caused by either CE (6 of 12; 50%) or hemorrhage (4 of 12; 33.3%) in a combined 83% of cases. Subcortical aphasia was because of SVD in 36% (31 of 85) or because of hemorrhage in 32% (27 of 85) yielding a combined 68% of cases. Sixty percent of transcortical aphasias as a group were because of either large-vessel disease (7 of 20; 35%) or hemorrhage (5 of 20; 25%). Alternatively, a diagnosis of Broca aphasia could be because of any of the etiological categories.
(1) Aphasias are a heterogeneous entity in subtype and etiology; (2) Broca, global, anomic, and subcortical aphasias accounted for the vast majority of aphasia subtypes; (3) SVD, cardioembolism, and hemorrhage are significantly associated with certain signature aphasic syndromes; and (4) determination of aphasia subtype can assist with etiology, prognosis, influence aphasia therapy, and provide the basis for future randomized controlled trials with pharmacological therapy or behavioral therapy.
失语症是最常见的中风综合征之一,但人们对不同亚型的范围及其中风机制知之甚少。然而,亚型和病因已知会影响预后和恢复。
我们的目的是分析大型亚急性中风患者中的失语症亚型和病因。
连续入组来自专门的认知性中风登记处的患者。在中风发病的第一个月内进行了经过验证的认知筛查检查,这使得能够诊断出 14 种不同的失语症亚型。在急性和亚急性期间,从一种亚型演变为另一种亚型,有时会诊断出超过 1 种亚型。中风的病因是通过改良的 Org 10172 在急性中风治疗标准来确定的,该标准包括脑出血。排除标准包括痴呆、慢性内科疾病、药物滥用和严重抑郁。
在 2389 例中风患者中,排除(n=593)后,失语症患者为 625 例(625 例中有 1796 例;34.8%),亚类频率包括布罗卡失语症(n=170;27.2%)、命名性失语症(n=165;26.4%)、完全性失语症(n=119;19.04%)和皮质下失语症(n=57;9.12%)。较少见的亚型(总 n=40;6.7%)包括皮质间性失语症(n=11)、威尼克失语症(n=10)、传导性失语症(n=7)、失语症(n=3)、语义性失语症(n=3)、交叉性失语症(n=3)、单纯性词聋(n=2)和外国口音综合征(n=1)。失语症亚型和病因存在一些显著的关联(卡方:855.8,P 值<.0001)。Bonferroni 调整后的 P 值显示,命名性失语症与小血管疾病(SVD)显著相关(比值比[OR]=2.0254,95%置信区间[CI]:1.3820-2.9681),而完全性失语症患者主要与心源性栓塞(CE)病因相关(OR=2.3589,95%CI:1.5506-3.5885),且较少发生 SVD(OR=.2583,95%CI:.1444-.4654)。还有其他值得注意的推论。威尼克失语症由心源性栓塞(12 例中的 6 例;50%)或脑出血(12 例中的 4 例;33.3%)引起,合并占 83%。皮质下失语症因 SVD 占 36%(85 例中的 31 例)或因脑出血占 32%(85 例中的 27 例),合并占 68%。作为一个整体,皮质间性失语症的 60%是由于大血管疾病(20 例中的 7 例;35%)或脑出血(20 例中的 5 例;25%)引起的。相反,布罗卡失语症的诊断可以归因于任何病因类别。
(1)失语症在亚型和病因方面是一种异质实体;(2)布罗卡、完全性、命名性和皮质下失语症占失语症亚型的绝大多数;(3)SVD、心源性栓塞和脑出血与某些特定的失语症综合征显著相关;(4)确定失语症亚型可以帮助确定病因、预后、影响失语症治疗,并为未来的药理学或行为疗法的随机对照试验提供基础。