Clinic of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;170(7):759-67. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125.
OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.
各种认知行为疗法(CBT)已被证明对社交焦虑症有效。对于心理动力学疗法,这种疾病的疗效证据很少。作者在一项多中心随机对照试验中测试了心理动力学疗法和 CBT 在社交焦虑症中的疗效。
在门诊环境中,495 名社交焦虑症患者被随机分配到手册指导的 CBT(N=209)、手册指导的心理动力学疗法(N=207)或等候名单组(N=79)。在基线和治疗结束时进行评估。主要结局指标是根据评定者对组分配盲的 Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表,基于缓解和反应的发生率。还评估了几个次要措施。
CBT、心理动力学疗法和等候名单组的缓解率分别为 36%、26%和 9%。反应率分别为 60%、52%和 15%。CBT 和心理动力学疗法在缓解和反应方面均显著优于等候名单组。CBT 在缓解方面显著优于心理动力学疗法,但在反应方面则不然。缓解和反应的组间效应大小较小。次要结局指标显示,CBT 在社交恐惧症和人际关系问题方面的测量结果明显优于 CBT,但在抑郁方面则不然。
CBT 和心理动力学疗法在治疗社交焦虑症方面均有效,但 CBT 具有明显优势。对于 CBT,反应率与近年来瑞典和德国研究报告的比率相当。对于心理动力学疗法,反应率与药物治疗和认知行为团体治疗报告的比率相当。