Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taiwan.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(2):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3552-y. Epub 2013 May 17.
In our ability to selectively inhibit a subset of concurrent response tendencies, referred to as selective response inhibition, stopping-interference (SI) effects have been found and attributed to global inhibitory processes. In the standard stop-signal paradigm, the stop signal might not only signal stopping but also produce other effects simply by virtue of being an additional signal. Therefore, we investigated whether previously observed SI effects reflect not only selective response inhibition but also other effects caused by the appearance of the stop signal. In Experiment 1, we controlled for the possible extra influences of the stop signal and still found SI effects, allowing a more confident attribution of SI effects to global inhibitory processes. Furthermore, the extra signal affected the motor system, as revealed by a reduction in SI effects on response force after the improved control. Using the lateralized readiness potential, Experiment 2 showed that the extra signal affected relatively central motor processing. The findings thus advance our knowledge about the distinction between signal-related and motor-inhibitory effects in stop-signal tasks.
在选择性抑制部分并发反应倾向的能力方面,即选择性反应抑制方面,人们已经发现并归因于停止干扰(SI)效应的存在,这些效应归因于全局抑制过程。在标准的停止信号范式中,停止信号不仅可以通过信号本身的存在来指示停止,还可以产生其他影响。因此,我们研究了之前观察到的 SI 效应是否不仅反映了选择性反应抑制,还反映了停止信号出现所导致的其他影响。在实验 1 中,我们控制了停止信号可能产生的额外影响,仍然发现了 SI 效应,这使得我们更有信心将 SI 效应归因于全局抑制过程。此外,额外信号会影响运动系统,这从改进控制后对反应力的 SI 效应减少中可以看出。实验 2 使用了横向准备电位,表明额外信号会影响相对中央的运动处理。这些发现因此推进了我们对停止信号任务中信号相关和运动抑制效应之间区别的认识。