Muggenthaler Holger, Drobnik Stefanie, Hubig Michael, Schönpflug Markus, Mall Gita
Institute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Fürstengraben 23, D-07743, Jena, Germany.
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jul;58(4):1061-4. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12148. Epub 2013 May 17.
In the case presented, conflicting witness accounts and the subject's injuries were highly suspicious of an assault that might have caused the balcony fall. For the reconstruction, a simulation software, originally designed for motor vehicle accident reconstruction, was used. Three scenarios were simulated using the PC-Crash multibody pedestrian model: (S1) Subject was pushed against and fell over balcony rail, (S2) subject fell off from a seated position, (S3) subject fell off from a prone position on the rail. (S1) could be ruled out due to inconsistent results in terms of landing area and minimum velocity. Realistic results were obtained for (S3) with a fall off from a prone position on the rail. After a few months, the comatose subject awoke and gave an account of what had happened being consistent with the simulation results. This case demonstrates the feasibility of multibody simulations also in cases of nontraffic incidents.
在本案中,相互矛盾的证人陈述以及受害者的伤势,让人高度怀疑这是一起可能导致受害者从阳台坠落的袭击事件。在重建过程中,使用了一款最初为机动车事故重建设计的模拟软件。利用PC - Crash多体行人模型模拟了三种情景:(S1)受害者被推挤后翻过阳台栏杆;(S2)受害者从坐姿跌落;(S3)受害者趴在栏杆上跌落。由于在着陆区域和最小速度方面结果不一致,(S1)可以排除。对于(S3),即受害者趴在栏杆上跌落的情景,得到了符合实际的结果。几个月后,处于昏迷状态的受害者苏醒,并讲述了与模拟结果相符的事件经过。该案例证明了多体模拟在非交通事故案例中的可行性。