• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膝关节数值实体评估评分(KNEES-ACL)的开发:一种特定于疾病的问卷。

Development of the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL): a condition-specific questionnaire.

机构信息

Section for Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Oct;23(5):e293-301. doi: 10.1111/sms.12079. Epub 2013 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/sms.12079
PMID:23683035
Abstract

Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to gauge treatment effects in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Valid measures of specific conditions depend on relevant item content. While item content can be derived either from clinicians (face validity) or from patients, item relevance and comprehensiveness can only be confirmed by the patient (content validity). Focus group and single interviews were conducted with patients' pre- and post-ACL reconstruction in order to construct a condition-specific PROM for the target patients. One hundred fifty-seven items from a previously conducted literature search were used as a basis for content genesis. Content saturation was achieved after three focus groups and seven single interviews. Thirty-eight items from the literature search were directly endorsed, and five modified items were endorsed. Twelve new item themes with verbatim content emerged. Thus, a 55-item pilot PROM consisting of six conceptual domains was assembled. We have constructed a condition-specific PROM for measurement of surgical and non-surgical treatment effects on ACL deficiency. The instrument possesses face and content validity. A pilot survey to assess the psychometric properties will be performed using Rasch measurement theory.

摘要

患者相关结局测量(PROMs)常用于评估前交叉韧带(ACL)缺陷患者的治疗效果。特定条件的有效测量取决于相关项目内容。虽然项目内容可以从临床医生(表面效度)或患者中得出,但项目相关性和全面性只能由患者(内容效度)确认。对 ACL 重建前后的患者进行了焦点小组和单项访谈,以构建针对目标患者的特定于疾病的 PROM。从先前进行的文献检索中使用了 157 个项目作为内容生成的基础。经过三个焦点小组和七次单项访谈,实现了内容饱和度。文献检索中有 38 个项目直接得到认可,有 5 个修改后的项目得到认可。出现了 12 个具有逐字内容的新主题项目。因此,组装了一个包含六个概念领域的 55 个项目的初步 PROM。我们已经构建了一种特定于疾病的 PROM,用于测量 ACL 缺陷的手术和非手术治疗效果。该工具具有表面效度和内容效度。将使用 Rasch 测量理论进行初步调查以评估心理测量特性。

相似文献

1
Development of the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL): a condition-specific questionnaire.膝关节数值实体评估评分(KNEES-ACL)的开发:一种特定于疾病的问卷。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Oct;23(5):e293-301. doi: 10.1111/sms.12079. Epub 2013 May 20.
2
Dimensionality of the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL): a condition-specific questionnaire.膝关节数字实体评估评分(KNEES-ACL)的维度:一种特定于疾病的问卷。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Oct;23(5):e302-12. doi: 10.1111/sms.12078. Epub 2013 May 20.
3
KNEES-ACL has superior responsiveness compared to the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for anterior cruciate ligament injury.膝关节前交叉韧带(ACL)比最常用于前交叉韧带损伤的患者报告结局测量具有更好的反应性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2438-2446. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4961-z. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
4
English Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL): A Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.膝关节数字实体评估评分(KNEES-ACL)的英文翻译与文化调适:一种用于前交叉韧带损伤的特定于疾病的患者报告结局测量工具。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Oct;52(12):2980-2986. doi: 10.1177/03635465241274151. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
5
[The effect of central anatomical single-bundle versus anatomical double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on knee stability. a clinical study].[前交叉韧带中央解剖单束与解剖双束重建对膝关节稳定性的影响。一项临床研究]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(4):276-80.
6
Health-related quality of life for children with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: Ensuring content validity of the new KIDS-KNEES-ACL questionnaire.前交叉韧带损伤儿童的健康相关生活质量:确保新的KIDS-KNEES-ACL问卷的内容效度。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Feb;33(2):555-566. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12393. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
7
How to develop a condition-specific PROM.如何开发特定疾病的 PROM。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jun;31(6):1216-1224. doi: 10.1111/sms.13868. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
8
Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL-Return to Sports after Injury questionnaire.瑞典版 ACL-Return to Sports after Injury 问卷的翻译和测量特性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Oct;23(5):568-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01438.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
9
Single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged over 50 years.50 岁以上患者的单束和双束前交叉韧带重建。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Nov;28(11):1702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.146. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
10
[Effectiveness of computer-assisted preoperative planning system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].[计算机辅助术前规划系统在前交叉韧带重建中的有效性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;27(12):1432-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Posterior tibial slope has no impact on treatment outcome in anterior cruciate ligament revision patients.胫骨后倾角度对前交叉韧带翻修患者的治疗结果没有影响。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Aug 29;12(3):e70377. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70377. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Usefulness of Current Patient-Reported Outcome Scales for ACL Injury: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Stakeholder-Perceived Utility of Specific Constructs and Items Across the Rehabilitation Timeline.当前患者报告的前交叉韧带损伤结局量表的效用:对康复过程中特定结构和项目的利益相关者感知效用的混合方法评估。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 May 22;12(3):23259671231218964. doi: 10.1177/23259671231218964. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Functional performance tests, clinical measurements, and patient-reported outcome measures do not correlate as outcomes 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
功能绩效测试、临床测量和患者报告的结果测量在 ACL 重建后 1 年的结果并不相关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5905-5912. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07648-w. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Combined anterior cruciate ligament revision with reconstruction of the antero-lateral ligament does not improve outcome at 2-year follow-up compared to isolated acl revision; a randomized controlled trial.与单纯前交叉韧带(ACL)重建相比,联合前交叉韧带重建与前外侧韧带重建在 2 年随访时并不能改善结局:一项随机对照试验。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):5077-5086. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07558-x. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: shortcomings in evaluating knee function in persons undergoing ACL reconstruction.膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分:在评估前交叉韧带重建患者膝关节功能方面的不足。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Nov;30(11):3594-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06990-9. Epub 2022 May 7.
6
Four of five frequently used orthopedic PROMs possess inadequate content validity: a COSMIN evaluation of the mHHS, HAGOS, IKDC-SKF, KOOS and KNEES-ACL.五种常用的骨科 PROM 中有四种具有不足的内容效度:mHHS、HAGOS、IKDC-SKF、KOOS 和 KNEES-ACL 的 COSMIN 评估。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Nov;30(11):3602-3615. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06761-y. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Assessment of content validity and psychometric properties of VISA-A for Achilles tendinopathy.评估 VISA-A 在跟腱病中的内容效度和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247152. eCollection 2021.
8
Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group.前交叉韧带损伤的临床转归:黑豹研讨会前交叉韧带损伤临床转归共识小组。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2415-2434. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06061-x. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group.前交叉韧带损伤后的临床结果:黑豹研讨会前交叉韧带损伤临床结果共识小组
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 23;8(7):2325967120934751. doi: 10.1177/2325967120934751. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Forward lunge before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Faster movement but unchanged knee joint biomechanics.前交叉韧带重建前后的前向弓步:运动速度更快,但膝关节生物力学不变。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0228071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228071. eCollection 2020.