Suppr超能文献

职业危害:泌尿科医生的辐射暴露——制定参考标准。

Occupational hazard: radiation exposure for the urologist--developing a reference standard.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Division of Urology, U C San Diego Health Science System, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Mar-Apr;39(2):209-13. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.02.09.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To date, there is a paucity of literature offering practicing urologists a reference for the amount of radiation exposure received while surgically managing urolithiasis. This study examines the cumulative radiation exposure of an urologist over 9 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a case series of fluoroscopic exposures of an experienced stone surgeon operating at an academic comprehensive stone center between April and December 2011. Radiation exposure measurements were determined by a thermoluminescent dosimeter worn on the outside of the surgeon's thyroid shield. Estimations of radiation exposure (mrem) per month were charted with fluoroscopy times, using scatter plots to estimate Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The total 9-month radiation exposure was 87 mrems for deep dose equivalent (DDE), 293 mrem for lens dose equivalent (LDE), and 282 mrem for shallow dose equivalent (SDE). Total fluoroscopy time was 252.44 minutes for 64 ureteroscopies (URSs), 29 percutaneous nephrolithtomies (PNLs), 20 cystoscopies with ureteral stent placements, 9 shock wave lithotripsies (SWLs), 9 retrograde pyelograms (RPGs), 2 endoureterotomies, and 1 ureteral balloon dilation. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients examining the association between fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure were not significant for DDE (p = 0.6, Spearman's rho = 0.2), LDE (p = 0.6, Spearman's rho = 0.2), or SDE (p = 0.6, Spearman's rho = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 9-month period, total radiation exposures were well below annual accepted limits (DDE 5000 mrem, LDE 15,000 mrem and SDE 50,000 mrem). Although fluoroscopy time did not correlate with radiation exposure, future prospective studies can account for co-variates such as patient obesity and urologist distance from radiation source.

摘要

简介

迄今为止,鲜有文献为泌尿科医生提供有关在处理尿石症时接受的辐射量的参考。本研究检查了一位经验丰富的结石外科医生在 2011 年 4 月至 12 月期间在学术综合结石中心进行手术时的累积辐射暴露量。

材料和方法

我们呈现了一位经验丰富的结石外科医生在 2011 年 4 月至 12 月期间在学术综合结石中心进行手术时的累积辐射暴露量。通过佩戴在外科医生甲状腺屏蔽外部的热释光剂量计来确定辐射暴露测量值。使用散点图估计斯皮尔曼等级相关系数,绘制每月的辐射暴露量(mrem)与透视时间的图表。

结果

9 个月的总辐射暴露量为深部剂量当量(DDE)87mrems、晶状体剂量当量(LDE)293mrems 和浅层剂量当量(SDE)282mrems。总共进行了 64 例输尿管镜检查术(URS)、29 例经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)、20 例膀胱镜检查术加输尿管支架置入术、9 例体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)、9 例逆行肾盂造影术(RPG)、2 例输尿管内切开术和 1 例输尿管球囊扩张术,透视时间为 252.44 分钟。DDE(p=0.6,斯皮尔曼 rho=0.2)、LDE(p=0.6,斯皮尔曼 rho=0.2)和 SDE(p=0.6,斯皮尔曼 rho=0.2)之间的相关性没有统计学意义。

结论

在 9 个月的时间里,总辐射暴露量远低于每年接受的辐射限制(DDE 5000mrem、LDE 15000mrem 和 SDE 50000mrem)。尽管透视时间与辐射暴露量没有相关性,但未来的前瞻性研究可以考虑患者肥胖和外科医生与辐射源的距离等协变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验