Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1.
J Cell Sci. 2013 Jul 15;126(Pt 14):3113-20. doi: 10.1242/jcs.123430. Epub 2013 May 17.
Gap junctions are unique intercellular channels formed by the proper docking of two hemichannels from adjacent cells. Each hemichannel is a hexamer of connexins (Cxs) - the gap junction subunits, which are encoded by 21 homologous genes in the human genome. The docking of two hemichannels to form a functional gap junction channel is only possible between compatible Cxs, but the underlying molecular mechanism is unclear. On the basis of the crystal structure of the Cx26 gap junction, we developed homology models for homotypic and heterotypic channels from Cx32 and/or Cx26; these models predict six hydrogen bonds at the docking interface of each pair of the second extracellular domain (E2). A Cx32 mutation N175H and a human-disease-linked mutant N175D were predicted to lose the majority of the hydrogen bonds at the E2 docking-interface; experimentally both mutations failed to form morphological and functional gap junctions. To restore the lost hydrogen bonds, two complementary Cx26 mutants - K168V and K168A were designed to pair with the Cx32 mutants. When docked with Cx26K168V or K168A, the Cx32N175H mutant was successfully rescued morphologically and functionally in forming gap junction channels, but not Cx32 mutant N175Y. By testing more homotypic and heterotypic Cx32 and/or Cx26 mutant combinations, it is revealed that a minimum of four hydrogen bonds at each E2-docking interface are required for proper docking and functional channel formation between Cx26 and Cx32 hemichannels. Interestingly, the disease-linked Cx32N175D could be rescued by Cx26D179N, which restored five hydrogen bonds at the E2-docking interface. Our findings not only provide a mechanism for gap junction docking for Cx26 and Cx32 hemichannels, but also a potential therapeutic strategy for gap junction channelopathies.
缝隙连接是由相邻细胞的两个连接子半通道正确对接形成的独特细胞间通道。每个连接子半通道都是由 21 个同源基因在人类基因组中编码的连接子(Cx)的六聚体。只有在兼容的 Cx 之间,两个连接子半通道才能对接形成功能性缝隙连接通道,但潜在的分子机制尚不清楚。基于 Cx26 缝隙连接的晶体结构,我们为 Cx32 和/或 Cx26 的同源和异源通道构建了同源模型;这些模型预测每对第二细胞外结构域(E2)对接界面有 6 个氢键。预测 Cx32 突变 N175H 和与人类疾病相关的突变 N175D 会失去 E2 对接界面的大部分氢键;实验表明,这两种突变都不能形成形态和功能上的缝隙连接。为了恢复丢失的氢键,设计了两个互补的 Cx26 突变体 - K168V 和 K168A 与 Cx32 突变体配对。当与 Cx26K168V 或 K168A 对接时,Cx32N175H 突变体在形成缝隙连接通道方面在形态和功能上都得到了成功挽救,但 Cx32 突变体 N175Y 则没有。通过测试更多的同源和异源 Cx32 和/或 Cx26 突变体组合,揭示了 Cx26 和 Cx32 连接子半通道之间正确对接和功能性通道形成需要每个 E2 对接界面至少有 4 个氢键。有趣的是,与疾病相关的 Cx32N175D 可以通过 Cx26D179N 挽救,该突变在 E2 对接界面恢复了 5 个氢键。我们的发现不仅为 Cx26 和 Cx32 连接子半通道的缝隙连接对接提供了机制,也为缝隙连接通道病提供了潜在的治疗策略。