Campbell David J T, Ronksley Paul E, Hemmelgarn Brenda R, Zhang Jianguo, Barnabe Cheryl, Tonelli Marcello, Manns Braden
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Open Med. 2012 Dec 11;6(4):e155-65. Print 2012.
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its complications is higher among First Nations people and people with low socio-economic status (SES). Previous studies in Alberta have shown that provision of care through Primary Care Networks (PCNs) is associated with better quality of care and better outcomes for people with diabetes, possibly because of greater utilization of chronic disease management programs. However, it is unknown whether First Nations individuals and those in lower SES groups experience these benefits.
We used administrative and laboratory data for a population-based cohort analysis of Alberta residents under 65 years of age with diabetes. The primary outcome, assessed over a 1-year period, was admission to hospital or emergency department visit for a diabetes-specific ambulatory care sensitive condition (ACSC). Secondary outcomes were 2 quality-of-care indicators (likelihood of measurement of glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] and or retinal screening) and 2 measures of health care utilization (visits to specialist and primary care physicians). We used negative binomial regression to determine the association between care within a PCN and hospital admission or emergency department visit for diabetes-specific ACSCs. We also assessed outcomes in 3 populations of interest (individuals receiving a health care subsidy [household income less than $39 250 and not eligible for Income Support], those receiving Income Support, and First Nations individuals) relative to the remainder of the population, controlling for whether care was provided in a PCN and adjusting for several baseline characteristics.
We identified a total of 106 653 patients with diabetes eligible for our study, of whom 43 327 (41%) received care in a PCN. Receiving care through a PCN was associated with lower rates of ACSC-related hospital admission or emergency department visits for all groups of interest, which suggests that PCNs had similar effects across each group. However, regardless of where care was provided, First Nations and low-SES patients had more than twice the adjusted rates of hospital admission or emergency department visits for diabetes-specific ACSCs than the general population and were less likely to receive guideline-recommended care, including measurement of HbA1c and retinal screening.
Care in a PCN was associated with lower risks of hospital admission or emergency department visits for diabetes-specific ACSCs, even within vulnerable groups such as First Nations people and those of low SES. However, differences in outcomes and quality-of-care indicators persisted for First Nations individuals and those of low SES, relative to the general population, irrespective of where care was provided.
糖尿病及其并发症在原住民和社会经济地位(SES)较低的人群中更为普遍。艾伯塔省此前的研究表明,通过初级保健网络(PCN)提供护理与糖尿病患者获得更高质量的护理和更好的治疗效果相关,这可能是因为慢性病管理项目的利用率更高。然而,尚不清楚原住民个体和SES较低群体是否能从中受益。
我们使用行政和实验室数据,对艾伯塔省65岁以下患有糖尿病的居民进行基于人群的队列分析。主要结局是在1年期间内,因糖尿病特定的门诊护理敏感疾病(ACSC)而入院或前往急诊科就诊。次要结局是2个护理质量指标(糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]检测和/或视网膜筛查的可能性)和2个医疗保健利用指标(专科医生和初级保健医生就诊次数)。我们使用负二项回归来确定PCN内的护理与糖尿病特定ACSC的入院或急诊科就诊之间的关联。我们还评估了3个感兴趣人群(接受医疗补贴的个人[家庭收入低于39250加元且不符合收入支持条件]、接受收入支持的个人以及原住民个人)相对于其他人群的结局,控制护理是否在PCN中提供,并对几个基线特征进行调整。
我们共确定了106653名符合我们研究条件的糖尿病患者,其中43327名(41%)在PCN接受护理。通过PCN接受护理与所有感兴趣群体中与ACSC相关的入院或急诊科就诊率较低相关,这表明PCN对每个群体的影响相似。然而,无论护理在哪里提供,原住民和低SES患者因糖尿病特定ACSC而入院或急诊科就诊的调整率是普通人群的两倍多,并且接受指南推荐护理(包括HbA1c检测和视网膜筛查)的可能性较小。
即使在原住民和低SES等弱势群体中,PCN内的护理与糖尿病特定ACSC的入院或急诊科就诊风险较低相关。然而,相对于普通人群,原住民个人和低SES人群在结局和护理质量指标方面的差异仍然存在,无论护理在哪里提供。