Nishimura Holly M, Snguon Sevly, Moen Marik, Dean Lorraine T
Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Epidemiol Rev. 2025 Jan 10;47(1). doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxaf003.
Although the economic impact of guaranteed income (GI) (recurring, unconditional, and unrestricted cash transfers intended to supplement the income of participants) is well studied, much less is known about how GI may affect health, especially in the context of high-income countries like the United States and Canada. We searched 5 electronic databases for terms related to "guaranteed income" and "cash transfer" through April 23, 2022. Among 5340 records originally identified, 25 met our inclusion criteria and represented 16 unique GI initiatives. Most included studies used a quantitative approach (n = 22; 88%), were published between 2000 and 2022 (n = 21; 84%), and were conducted in the United States (n = 15; 60%). Health outcomes included maternal and child health (eg, preterm births, breastfeeding initiation), healthcare utilization (eg, hospital admissions), mental health (eg, depression), physical health (eg, body mass index), and behavioral health (eg, substance use). Maternal, infant, and child health were the most highly represented health outcomes. Guaranteed-income initiatives generally had significant positive impacts on health outcomes, especially among the most vulnerable recipients. Data were absent on neighborhood-level health outcomes, chronic and infectious diseases, potential unintended consequences, and long-term impacts of GI on health. Studies on the impact of GI on health suggest GI has the potential to positively affect many, but not all, health outcomes. Rigorous assessment of health outcomes is still needed, and additional health outcomes should be considered in the design and evaluation of GI initiatives.
虽然有保障收入(GI)(旨在补充参与者收入的定期、无条件和无限制现金转移)的经济影响已得到充分研究,但对于GI如何影响健康,尤其是在美国和加拿大等高收入国家的背景下,人们了解得要少得多。我们在5个电子数据库中搜索了与“有保障收入”和“现金转移”相关的术语,截至2022年4月23日。在最初识别的5340条记录中,25条符合我们的纳入标准,代表了16项独特的GI倡议。大多数纳入研究采用定量方法(n = 22;88%),发表于2000年至2022年之间(n = 21;84%),且在美国进行(n = 15;60%)。健康结果包括母婴健康(如早产、开始母乳喂养)、医疗保健利用(如住院)、心理健康(如抑郁)、身体健康(如体重指数)和行为健康(如物质使用)。母婴和儿童健康是最常出现的健康结果。有保障收入倡议通常对健康结果有显著的积极影响,尤其是在最脆弱的受助者中。关于社区层面的健康结果、慢性和传染病、潜在的意外后果以及GI对健康的长期影响的数据缺失。关于GI对健康影响的研究表明,GI有可能对许多但并非所有健康结果产生积极影响。仍需要对健康结果进行严格评估,并且在GI倡议的设计和评估中应考虑更多的健康结果。