Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013 Aug;28(5):440-9. doi: 10.1177/1533317513488916. Epub 2013 May 20.
In Alzheimer's disease (AD), placebo-controlled long-term studies of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are not permitted for ethical reasons. Therefore, in these studies, patients' outcomes on cognitive and functional assessment scales must be compared with mathematical models or historical data from untreated cohorts. PubMed and previously published long-term extensions of clinical trials and naturalistic studies of ChEIs were examined to identify empirical statistical models and other approaches, such as use of data from historical cohorts or extrapolated changes from extension studies, that were used to draw comparisons between ChEI-treated and untreated patients. The models and methods were described. It is essential to be aware of the limitations of comparisons made with these approaches. Prediction models based on ChEI-treated patients can be used in the studies of new treatments when those treatments are added to ChEIs. More sophisticated models that also accommodate patient-specific characteristics should be developed for comparisons in future long-term AD studies.
在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中,出于伦理原因,不允许进行安慰剂对照的胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEI)长期研究。因此,在这些研究中,必须将患者在认知和功能评估量表上的结果与数学模型或未经治疗队列的历史数据进行比较。本文通过查阅 PubMed 数据库和已发表的 ChEI 临床试验的长期扩展研究和自然研究,以确定经验统计模型和其他方法,如使用历史队列的数据或从扩展研究中推断的变化,来对接受 ChEI 治疗的患者和未接受治疗的患者进行比较。描述了这些模型和方法。必须要意识到使用这些方法进行比较的局限性。当新的治疗方法与 ChEI 联合使用时,可以在这些治疗方法的研究中使用基于接受 ChEI 治疗的患者的预测模型。应该为未来的 AD 长期研究中的比较开发更复杂的模型,这些模型还可以适应患者的个体特征。