Suppr超能文献

评价国际血栓与止血学会和儿科弥散性血管内凝血的机构诊断标准。

Evaluation of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and institutional diagnostic criteria of disseminated intravascular coagulation in pediatric patients.

机构信息

Department of Pathology & Immunology, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Jun;139(6):812-6. doi: 10.1309/AJCPO64IWNLYCVVB.

Abstract

Globally, adult intensive care units routinely use the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scoring system for identifying overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, in our pediatric intensive care unit, a modified diagnostic criterion (Texas Children's Hospital [TCH] criteria) that requires serial monitoring of the coagulation variables is employed. A retrospective analysis of 2,136 DIC panels from 130 patients who had at least 4 DIC panels during 1 admission to a pediatric intensive care unit was done to compare the diagnostic utility of the TCH criteria with the ISTH scoring method in children. Both scoring systems were evaluated against the gold standard diagnostic method of autopsy confirmation of DIC in the subset of children who died. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicates that TCH diagnostic criteria are comparable to the ISTH scoring method (area under the curve of 0.878 for TCH and 0.950 for ISTH). On the contrary, TCH diagnostic criteria perform better, with a sensitivity significantly higher than the ISTH scoring method when tested against the gold standard (P < .05). Fibrinogen is not a significant predictor of overt DIC in both models. Sequential testing of coagulation parameters is recommended for improved sensitivity when applying ISTH criteria to pediatric populations.

摘要

在全球范围内,成人重症监护病房通常使用国际血栓与止血学会 (ISTH) 评分系统来识别显性弥漫性血管内凝血 (DIC)。然而,在我们的儿科重症监护病房,采用了一种经过修改的诊断标准(德克萨斯儿童医院 [TCH] 标准),需要对凝血变量进行连续监测。对 130 名患者在儿科重症监护病房 1 次住院期间至少有 4 次 DIC 检测结果的 2136 个 DIC 检测结果进行了回顾性分析,比较了 TCH 标准与 ISTH 评分方法在儿童中的诊断效用。两种评分系统均针对死亡儿童子集的尸检确认 DIC 的金标准诊断方法进行了评估。受试者工作特征分析表明,TCH 诊断标准与 ISTH 评分方法相当(TCH 的曲线下面积为 0.878,ISTH 的曲线下面积为 0.950)。相反,TCH 诊断标准的性能更好,当与金标准进行测试时,其敏感性明显高于 ISTH 评分方法(P<0.05)。在这两种模型中,纤维蛋白原均不是显性 DIC 的显著预测因子。建议在将 ISTH 标准应用于儿科人群时,进行凝血参数的连续检测以提高敏感性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Therapeutics for paediatric oncological emergencies.儿科肿瘤急症的治疗方法。
Drugs Context. 2021 Jun 23;10. doi: 10.7573/dic.2020-11-5. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
DIC: which laboratory tests are most useful.DIC:哪些实验室检测最有用。
Blood Rev. 2011 Jan;25(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验