• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超市货架上快乐的母鸡:工业化“自由放养”对消费者意味着什么选择?

The happy hen on your supermarket shelf: what choice does industrial strength free-range represent for consumers?

机构信息

Monash University, Faculty of Law, Monash University Law Chambers, 555 Lonsdale St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Jun;10(2):165-86. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9448-5. Epub 2013 May 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11673-013-9448-5
PMID:23690245
Abstract

This paper investigates what "free-range" eggs are available for sale in supermarkets in Australia, what "free-range" means on product labelling, and what alternative "free-range" offers to cage production. The paper concludes that most of the "free-range" eggs currently available in supermarkets do not address animal welfare, environmental sustainability, and public health concerns but, rather, seek to drive down consumer expectations of what these issues mean by balancing them against commercial interests. This suits both supermarkets and egg producers because it does not challenge dominant industrial-scale egg production and the profits associated with it. A serious approach to free-range would confront these arrangements, and this means it may be impossible to truthfully label many of the "free-range" eggs currently available in the dominant supermarkets as free-range.

摘要

本文调查了在澳大利亚超市中可买到哪些“散养”鸡蛋,产品标签上的“散养”是什么意思,以及笼养生产的其他“散养”替代品。本文得出的结论是,目前超市中大多数“散养”鸡蛋并没有解决动物福利、环境可持续性和公共卫生问题,而是试图通过平衡商业利益来降低消费者对这些问题的期望。这对超市和鸡蛋生产商都有利,因为这不会对主导的工业规模鸡蛋生产及其相关利润构成挑战。认真对待“散养”问题会使这些安排受到挑战,这意味着目前在主导超市中出售的许多“散养”鸡蛋可能无法如实贴上“散养”标签。

相似文献

1
The happy hen on your supermarket shelf: what choice does industrial strength free-range represent for consumers?超市货架上快乐的母鸡:工业化“自由放养”对消费者意味着什么选择?
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Jun;10(2):165-86. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9448-5. Epub 2013 May 21.
2
Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: analysis of alternative production systems.美国鸡蛋生产可持续性的经济与市场问题:替代生产系统分析
Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):241-50. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00822.
3
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
4
Europe gets tough on labelling genetically modified foodstuffs.欧洲在转基因食品标签方面采取强硬措施。
Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):114. doi: 10.1038/418114a.
5
Comparison of environmental and egg microbiology associated with conventional and free-range laying hen management.比较传统笼养和散养方式下环境和鸡蛋微生物学的关联。
Poult Sci. 2011 Sep;90(9):2063-8. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01139.
6
Are views towards egg farming associated with Brazilian and Chilean egg consumers' purchasing habits?人们对于蛋鸡养殖的看法是否与巴西和智利鸡蛋消费者的购买习惯有关?
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 28;13(9):e0203867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203867. eCollection 2018.
7
Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context.美国鸡蛋生产的可持续性——政策与市场背景
Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):229-40. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00844.
8
The Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply: A unique public-private partnership for conducting research on the sustainability of animal housing systems using a multistakeholder approach.可持续鸡蛋供应联盟:一个独特的公私合作伙伴关系,采用多利益相关方方法对动物饲养系统的可持续性进行研究。
J Anim Sci. 2016 Mar;94(3):1296-308. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9680.
9
Assessing the sustainability of egg production systems in The Netherlands.评估荷兰鸡蛋生产系统的可持续性。
Poult Sci. 2015 Aug;94(8):1742-50. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev165. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
10
Hen genetic strain and extended cold storage influence on physical egg quality from cage-free aviary housing system.母鸡遗传品系和延长冷藏对自由放养式鸡舍系统中种蛋物理质量的影响。
Poult Sci. 2018 Jul 1;97(7):2347-2355. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex052.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Labelling Create Transformative Food System Change for Human and Planetary Health? A Case Study of Meat.标签能否为人类和地球健康创造变革性的食品系统变化?以肉类为例的案例研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):923-933. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.239.
2
Food ethics: issues of consumption and production : self-restraint and voluntaristic measures are not enough.食品伦理:消费与生产问题:自我约束和自愿性措施是不够的。
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Jun;10(2):145-8. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9446-7. Epub 2013 May 8.
3
Eating people is wrong … or how we decide morally what to eat.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK.英国 4 种鸡舍系统中蛋鸡福利的比较。
Br Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;51(4):488-99. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.502518.
2
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.理性选择与环境结构
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):129-38. doi: 10.1037/h0042769.
3
The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: history and prospects.欧盟对蛋鸡传统鸡笼的禁令:历史与前景
吃人是错误的……或者说我们如何在道德层面决定吃什么。
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Jun;10(2):129-31. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9444-9.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2003;6(2):103-21. doi: 10.1207/S15327604JAWS0602_03.
4
Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry systems.不同饲养系统中蛋鸡的骨骼结构和抗断强度
Br Poult Sci. 1994 Dec;35(5):651-62. doi: 10.1080/00071669408417731.