Department of Periodontics and Endodontics, 250 Squire Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7 Suppl):43S-8S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513484334. Epub 2013 May 20.
This study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a nasal spray to induce anesthesia of maxillary teeth. Forty-five healthy adults requiring restoration of one maxillary tooth were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receive (1) an intra-oral lidocaine-epinephrine injection with buffered saline nasal spray bilaterally, or (2) a tetracaine hydrochloride-oxymetazoline hydrochloride nasal spray bilaterally with sham injection. Primary endpoints were use of rescue anesthesia and patient global pain assessment. Secondary outcomes included vital sign changes, soft-tissue anesthesia, and treatment-emergent adverse events. In intent-to-treat analysis, 25 of 30 patients given nasal spray (83.3%) did not require rescue anesthesia. Proportion of anesthesia successes for nasal spray was significantly different from the hypothesized placebo anesthesia success of 30% (one-sided p value < .0001 by exact binomial test). Mean duration of soft-tissue anesthesia did not differ significantly by treatment for 3 of 4 sites assessed. No serious adverse events or systemic effects were observed. Tetracaine hydrochloride-oxymetazoline nasal spray appears to provide adequate and safe anesthesia for the majority of maxillary dental procedures. Based on the results from this Phase 2 study, pivotal trials are warranted to validate these findings in an expanded patient population.
本研究旨在评估一种用于诱导上颌牙齿麻醉的鼻腔喷雾的疗效、安全性和耐受性。45 名健康成年人因需要修复上颌一颗牙齿而被随机分为 1:2 比例,分别接受(1)口腔利多卡因-肾上腺素注射联合双侧缓冲盐水鼻腔喷雾,或(2)双侧盐酸四卡因-盐酸羟甲唑啉鼻腔喷雾联合假注射。主要终点为使用急救麻醉和患者总体疼痛评估。次要结局包括生命体征变化、软组织麻醉和治疗中出现的不良事件。意向治疗分析中,30 名接受鼻腔喷雾治疗的患者中有 25 名(83.3%)不需要急救麻醉。鼻腔喷雾的麻醉成功率与假设的安慰剂麻醉成功率 30%(单侧精确二项式检验 p 值<.0001)有显著差异。在评估的 4 个部位中,有 3 个部位的软组织麻醉持续时间无显著差异。未观察到严重不良事件或全身影响。盐酸四卡因-盐酸羟甲唑啉鼻腔喷雾似乎为大多数上颌牙科手术提供了足够和安全的麻醉效果。基于这项 2 期研究的结果,有必要进行关键性试验,以在更广泛的患者人群中验证这些发现。