Suppr超能文献

NMDA 受体拮抗剂治疗精神分裂症的随机、安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析。

NMDA receptor antagonists interventions in schizophrenia: Meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Sep;47(9):1143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined whether N-methyl d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists as adjunctive therapy have therapeutic potential for schizophrenia treatment.

METHOD

Systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Google Scholar up until October 2012 and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials were performed. Risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), numbers-needed-to-harm (NNH), and standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated.

RESULTS

Results were across 8 studies and 406 patients (85.5% schizophrenia related disorder and 14.5% bipolar disorder) were included (amantadine: 5 trials and 220 patients, memantine: 3 trials and 186 patients). NMDA receptor antagonists (NMDAR-ANTs) as adjunctive therapy were not superior to placebo in overall (SMD = -0.25, CI = -0.72, 0.23, p = 0.31, N = 6, n = 347), positive symptoms (SMD = -0.20, CI = -0.70, 0.31, p = 0.44, N = 4, n = 205), and negative symptoms (SMD = -0.69, CI = -1.65, 0.27, p = 0.16, N = 4, n = 205), and Clinical Global Impression Severity scale (SMD = -0.27, CI = -1.20, 0.65, p = 0.56, N = 3, n = 177). There was also no significant difference in discontinuation rate between NMDAR-ANTs and placebo treatments (all cause: RR = 1.23, CI = 0.89-1.70, p = 0.20, N = 8, n = 396, side effects: RR = 1.86, CI = 0.84-4.13, p = 0.13, N = 6, n = 359, inefficacy/worsening psychosis: RR = 0.70, CI = 0.20-2.38, p = 0.56, N = 7, n = 380). However, memantine was favorable compared with placebo in Mini-Mental State Examination in schizophrenia (SMD = -0.77, CI = -1.27, -0.28, p = 0.002, N = 3, n = 71). While NMDAR-ANTs caused weight loss compared with placebo (SMD = -0.42, CI = -0.73, -0.11, p = 0.008, N = 3, n = 165), amantadine caused more frequent insomnia than placebo (RR = 3.83, CI = 1.41-10.38, p = 0.008, NNH = 9, p = 0.002, N = 2, n = 147).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that NMDAR-ANTs as adjunctive therapy may improve cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Because the included studies were small, a replication study using larger samples is needed.

摘要

背景

我们研究了 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂作为辅助治疗是否对精神分裂症治疗具有治疗潜力。

方法

对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、PsycINFO 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间截至 2012 年 10 月,并对随机安慰剂对照试验进行了荟萃分析。计算了风险比(RR)、95%置信区间(CI)、需要治疗人数(NNH)和标准化均数差(SMD)。

结果

共有 8 项研究和 406 名患者(85.5%为精神分裂症相关障碍,14.5%为双相障碍)纳入研究(金刚烷胺:5 项研究,220 名患者;美金刚:3 项研究,186 名患者)。NMDA 受体拮抗剂(NMDAR-ANTs)作为辅助治疗,在总体症状(SMD=-0.25,CI=-0.72,0.23,p=0.31,N=6,n=347)、阳性症状(SMD=-0.20,CI=-0.70,0.31,p=0.44,N=4,n=205)和阴性症状(SMD=-0.69,CI=-1.65,0.27,p=0.16,N=4,n=205)以及临床总体印象严重程度量表(SMD=-0.27,CI=-1.20,0.65,p=0.56,N=3,n=177)方面,与安慰剂治疗无显著差异。NMDAR-ANTs 与安慰剂治疗的停药率也无显著差异(所有原因:RR=1.23,CI=0.89-1.70,p=0.20,N=8,n=396,副作用:RR=1.86,CI=0.84-4.13,p=0.13,N=6,n=359,疗效不佳/恶化精神病:RR=0.70,CI=0.20-2.38,p=0.56,N=7,n=380)。然而,与安慰剂相比,美金刚在精神分裂症的简易精神状态检查中更有利(SMD=-0.77,CI=-1.27,-0.28,p=0.002,N=3,n=71)。虽然 NMDAR-ANTs 与安慰剂相比会导致体重减轻(SMD=-0.42,CI=-0.73,-0.11,p=0.008,N=3,n=165),但金刚烷胺与安慰剂相比会导致更多的失眠(RR=3.83,CI=1.41-10.38,p=0.008,NNH=9,p=0.002,N=2,n=147)。

结论

我们的结果表明,NMDA 受体拮抗剂作为辅助治疗可能改善精神分裂症患者的认知功能。由于纳入的研究规模较小,需要使用更大的样本进行复制研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验