Kardiologie und Angiologie II, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, D-79189 Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Circulation. 2013 Jun 25;127(25):2535-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001849. Epub 2013 May 21.
Stenting has been shown to improve patency after femoral artery revascularization compared with balloon angioplasty. Limited data are available evaluating endovascular treatment for obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery.
This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial compared primary nitinol stent placement to percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty in patients with peripheral artery disease Rutherford-Becker class 2 to 5 who had a de novo lesion in the popliteal artery. The primary study end point was 1-year primary patency, defined as freedom from target-lesion restenosis (luminal narrowing of ≥50%) as detected by duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included target-lesion revascularization rate and changes in Rutherford-Becker class. Provisional stent placement was considered target-lesion revascularization and loss of primary patency. Two hundred forty-six patients were included in this trial. The mean target-lesion length was 42.3 mm. One hundred ninety-seven patients were available for the1-year follow-up. The 1-year primary patency rate was significantly higher in the group with primary nitinol stent placement (67.4%) than in the percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty group (44.9%, P=0.002). Target-lesion revascularization rates were 14.7% and 44.1%, respectively (P=0.0001); however, when provisional nitinol stent placement was not considered target-lesion revascularization and loss in patency, no significant differences prevailed between the study groups (67.4% versus 65.7%, P=0.92 for primary patency). Approximately 73% of patients in the percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty group and 77% in the nitinol stent group showed an improvement of ≥1 Rutherford-Becker class (P=0.31).
Primary nitinol stent placement for obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery achieves superior acute technical success and higher 1-year primary patency only if provisional stenting is considered target-lesion revascularization. Provisional stenting as part of a percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty strategy has equivalent 1-year patency and should be preferred over primary stenting.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00712309.
与球囊血管成形术相比,支架置入术已被证明可改善股动脉血运重建后的通畅率。目前,关于经皮腔内血管成形术治疗腘动脉阻塞性病变的相关数据非常有限。
本前瞻性、随机、多中心试验比较了经皮腔内血管成形术治疗外周动脉疾病 Rutherford-Becker 2 至 5 级患者腘动脉起始段新发狭窄病变患者中,一期使用镍钛诺支架置入术与经皮腔内血管成形术的疗效。主要研究终点为 1 年通畅率,定义为通过超声多普勒检测到靶病变无再狭窄(管腔狭窄≥50%)。次要终点包括靶病变血运重建率和 Rutherford-Becker 分级的变化。临时支架置入被视为靶病变血运重建和通畅率丢失。本试验共纳入 246 例患者,平均靶病变长度为 42.3mm。197 例患者获得 1 年随访。一期镍钛诺支架置入组的 1 年通畅率明显高于经皮腔内血管成形术组(67.4%比 44.9%,P=0.002)。靶病变血运重建率分别为 14.7%和 44.1%(P=0.0001);然而,当不将临时镍钛诺支架置入视为靶病变血运重建和通畅率丢失时,两组间无显著差异(通畅率为 67.4%比 65.7%,P=0.92)。经皮腔内血管成形术组约 73%和镍钛诺支架组 77%的患者至少改善了 1 个 Rutherford-Becker 分级(P=0.31)。
对于腘动脉阻塞性病变,一期镍钛诺支架置入术可获得较好的即时技术效果和更高的 1 年通畅率,但前提是将临时支架置入视为靶病变血运重建。经皮腔内血管成形术联合临时支架置入作为一种策略,其 1 年通畅率与一期支架置入相当,应优于一期支架置入。