Suppr超能文献

支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗腘动脉阻塞性病变:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机试验。

Stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

机构信息

Kardiologie und Angiologie II, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, D-79189 Bad Krozingen, Germany.

出版信息

Circulation. 2013 Jun 25;127(25):2535-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001849. Epub 2013 May 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stenting has been shown to improve patency after femoral artery revascularization compared with balloon angioplasty. Limited data are available evaluating endovascular treatment for obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial compared primary nitinol stent placement to percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty in patients with peripheral artery disease Rutherford-Becker class 2 to 5 who had a de novo lesion in the popliteal artery. The primary study end point was 1-year primary patency, defined as freedom from target-lesion restenosis (luminal narrowing of ≥50%) as detected by duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included target-lesion revascularization rate and changes in Rutherford-Becker class. Provisional stent placement was considered target-lesion revascularization and loss of primary patency. Two hundred forty-six patients were included in this trial. The mean target-lesion length was 42.3 mm. One hundred ninety-seven patients were available for the1-year follow-up. The 1-year primary patency rate was significantly higher in the group with primary nitinol stent placement (67.4%) than in the percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty group (44.9%, P=0.002). Target-lesion revascularization rates were 14.7% and 44.1%, respectively (P=0.0001); however, when provisional nitinol stent placement was not considered target-lesion revascularization and loss in patency, no significant differences prevailed between the study groups (67.4% versus 65.7%, P=0.92 for primary patency). Approximately 73% of patients in the percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty group and 77% in the nitinol stent group showed an improvement of ≥1 Rutherford-Becker class (P=0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary nitinol stent placement for obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery achieves superior acute technical success and higher 1-year primary patency only if provisional stenting is considered target-lesion revascularization. Provisional stenting as part of a percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty strategy has equivalent 1-year patency and should be preferred over primary stenting.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00712309.

摘要

背景

与球囊血管成形术相比,支架置入术已被证明可改善股动脉血运重建后的通畅率。目前,关于经皮腔内血管成形术治疗腘动脉阻塞性病变的相关数据非常有限。

方法和结果

本前瞻性、随机、多中心试验比较了经皮腔内血管成形术治疗外周动脉疾病 Rutherford-Becker 2 至 5 级患者腘动脉起始段新发狭窄病变患者中,一期使用镍钛诺支架置入术与经皮腔内血管成形术的疗效。主要研究终点为 1 年通畅率,定义为通过超声多普勒检测到靶病变无再狭窄(管腔狭窄≥50%)。次要终点包括靶病变血运重建率和 Rutherford-Becker 分级的变化。临时支架置入被视为靶病变血运重建和通畅率丢失。本试验共纳入 246 例患者,平均靶病变长度为 42.3mm。197 例患者获得 1 年随访。一期镍钛诺支架置入组的 1 年通畅率明显高于经皮腔内血管成形术组(67.4%比 44.9%,P=0.002)。靶病变血运重建率分别为 14.7%和 44.1%(P=0.0001);然而,当不将临时镍钛诺支架置入视为靶病变血运重建和通畅率丢失时,两组间无显著差异(通畅率为 67.4%比 65.7%,P=0.92)。经皮腔内血管成形术组约 73%和镍钛诺支架组 77%的患者至少改善了 1 个 Rutherford-Becker 分级(P=0.31)。

结论

对于腘动脉阻塞性病变,一期镍钛诺支架置入术可获得较好的即时技术效果和更高的 1 年通畅率,但前提是将临时支架置入视为靶病变血运重建。经皮腔内血管成形术联合临时支架置入作为一种策略,其 1 年通畅率与一期支架置入相当,应优于一期支架置入。

临床试验注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00712309。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验