• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腘动脉疾病药物涂层球囊治疗后的临床结局:K-POP注册研究12个月结果

Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Popliteal Artery Disease: K-POP Registry 12-Month Results.

作者信息

Park Jong-Il, Ko Young-Guk, Lee Seung-Jun, Ahn Chul-Min, Rha Seung-Woon, Yu Cheol-Woong, Park Jong Kwan, Park Sang-Ho, Lee Jae-Hwan, Kim Su-Hong, Lee Yong-Joon, Hong Sung-Jin, Kim Jung-Sun, Kim Byeong-Keuk, Hong Myeong-Ki, Choi Donghoon

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2024 Aug;54(8):454-465. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0006. Epub 2024 Apr 29.

DOI:10.4070/kcj.2024.0006
PMID:38767445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11306430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a "no-stent zone." Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free rate.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency.

CONCLUSIONS

DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698345.

摘要

背景与目的

腘动脉通常被视为“无支架区域”。关于药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗腘动脉疾病的疗效数据有限。本研究旨在评估接受DCB治疗的动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉疾病患者的12个月临床疗效。

方法

这项前瞻性、多中心注册研究纳入了来自7个韩国血管内治疗中心的100例患者,这些患者因有症状的动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉疾病接受了使用IN.PACT DCB(美敦力公司)的血管内治疗。主要终点为12个月临床原发通畅率,次要终点为临床驱动的靶病变血管重建(TLR)无发生率。

结果

研究队列的平均年龄为65.7±10.8岁,77%的入组患者为男性。平均病变长度为93.7±53.7毫米,45%的患者存在完全闭塞。所有患者均取得技术成功。17%的患者接受了联合斑块旋切术,11%的患者需要临时支架置入。在入组患者中,91例完成了12个月的随访。12个月时的临床原发通畅率和无TLR生存率分别为76.0%和87.2%。多因素Cox回归分析确定女性和病变长度较长是通畅性丧失的显著独立预测因素。

结论

DCB治疗在腘动脉疾病患者中产生了良好的12个月临床原发通畅率和无TLR生存结局。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02698345。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/92004c69c4ab/kcj-54-454-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/a5a65527aafd/kcj-54-454-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/99b4d421e00c/kcj-54-454-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/41f28cf0dc4c/kcj-54-454-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/92004c69c4ab/kcj-54-454-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/a5a65527aafd/kcj-54-454-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/99b4d421e00c/kcj-54-454-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/41f28cf0dc4c/kcj-54-454-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273d/11306430/92004c69c4ab/kcj-54-454-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Popliteal Artery Disease: K-POP Registry 12-Month Results.腘动脉疾病药物涂层球囊治疗后的临床结局:K-POP注册研究12个月结果
Korean Circ J. 2024 Aug;54(8):454-465. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0006. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
2
Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Isolated Popliteal Artery Lesions.抗再狭窄治疗的定向斑块旋切术与单纯药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗孤立性腘动脉病变的比较
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):181-188. doi: 10.1177/1526602816683933. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Three-Year Sustained Clinical Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in a Real-World Femoropopliteal Cohort.药物涂层球囊血管成形术在真实世界股腘动脉队列中的三年持续临床疗效
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):693-705. doi: 10.1177/1526602820931477. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
4
Drug-Coated Balloon vs Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: One-Year Results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan Randomized Trial.药物涂层球囊与标准经皮腔内血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近段粥样硬化病变:MDT-2113 SFA 日本随机试验一年结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Feb;25(1):109-117. doi: 10.1177/1526602817745565. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Durability of Treatment Effect Using a Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of IN.PACT SFA.药物涂层球囊治疗股浅动脉病变的疗效持久性:IN.PACT SFA 的 24 个月结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2329-2338. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.063. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
6
Optimized drug-coated balloon angioplasty of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries using the Tack Endovascular System: TOBA III 12-month results.使用Tack血管内系统对股浅动脉和腘动脉近端进行优化的药物涂层球囊血管成形术:TOBA III研究12个月结果
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1636-1647.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.078. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries: The COPA CABANA Trial.紫杉醇涂层球囊与非涂层球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉支架内再狭窄:COPA CABANA 试验。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):276-286. doi: 10.1177/1526602820907917. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
8
Stent placement vs. balloon angioplasty for popliteal artery treatment: two-year results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.腘动脉治疗中支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机试验的两年结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Feb;22(1):22-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602814564386.
9
Different endovascular modalities of treatment for isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions (EMO-POP) registry.孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉病变的不同血管内治疗方式(EMO-POP)登记研究
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):231-240.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.170. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
10
Stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗腘动脉阻塞性病变:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机试验。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 25;127(25):2535-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001849. Epub 2013 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of one-year clinically driven revascularization following endovascular treatment of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions.孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉病变血管内治疗后一年临床驱动性血运重建的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17283-9.
2
Treatment Options in Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease.孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉疾病的治疗选择
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Apr 27;12(5):170. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050170.
3
Should We Leave Something There?我们应该在那里留下些什么吗?

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Atherectomy Plus Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-coated Balloon Alone in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.斑块旋切术联合药物涂层球囊与单纯药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉疾病的临床疗效
Korean Circ J. 2022 Feb;52(2):123-133. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0246. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Isolated Chronic Occlusion of the Popliteal Artery: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study.药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗孤立性慢性腘动脉闭塞的疗效:回顾性单中心研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Apr;32(4):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.12.024. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
3
Sex-Related Differences in the Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease Treated with the IN.PACT Drug-Coated Balloon in the IN.PACT SFA Randomized Controlled Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.
Korean Circ J. 2024 Aug;54(8):466-467. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0182.
IN.PACT SFA随机对照试验中使用IN.PACT药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉疾病患者长期预后的性别差异:一项事后分析
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1410-1418.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.05.012.
4
Three-Year Sustained Clinical Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in a Real-World Femoropopliteal Cohort.药物涂层球囊血管成形术在真实世界股腘动脉队列中的三年持续临床疗效
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):693-705. doi: 10.1177/1526602820931477. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Real-World Results of Supera Stent Implantation for Popliteal Artery Atherosclerotic Lesions: 3-Year Outcome.Supera支架植入治疗腘动脉粥样硬化病变的真实世界结果:3年随访结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.038. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
6
Systematic review and updated meta-analysis of the use of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus plain old balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗股腘动脉疾病的系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):981-995.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.080. Epub 2019 May 21.
7
Incidence and Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease: Outcomes from the IPAD Multicenter Study.孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉疾病的发病率及血管内治疗:IPAD多中心研究结果
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1481-1487. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2028-7. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
One-Year Outcomes Following Directional Atherectomy of Popliteal Artery Lesions: Subgroup Analysis of the Prospective, Multicenter DEFINITIVE LE Trial.经皮血管腔内斑块旋切术治疗腘动脉病变 1 年随访结果:前瞻性、多中心 DEFINITIVE LE 试验的亚组分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Feb;25(1):100-108. doi: 10.1177/1526602817740133. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
9
Limb flexion-induced axial compression and bending in human femoropopliteal artery segments.肢体弯曲引起的人股浅动脉节段轴向压缩和弯曲。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):607-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.071. Epub 2017 May 16.
10
Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Isolated Popliteal Artery Lesions.抗再狭窄治疗的定向斑块旋切术与单纯药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗孤立性腘动脉病变的比较
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):181-188. doi: 10.1177/1526602816683933. Epub 2016 Dec 23.