Suppr超能文献

使用双标记水法和能量平衡法对健康婴儿估计的能量消耗进行比较。

Comparison of energy expenditure estimated in healthy infants using the doubly labelled water and energy balance methods.

作者信息

Wong W W, Butte N F, Garza C, Klein P D

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 1990 Mar;44(3):175-84.

PMID:2369883
Abstract

The doubly labelled water method was used to estimate energy expenditure in 20 formula-fed infants (10 aged 1 month and 10 aged 4 months). We then compared the energy expenditure values with energy balance values calculated from energy intake and energy cost of growth. Our purpose was to compare various published equations for calculating CO2 expiration rates (and thus energy expenditure values) from the isotopic data. Those equations in which we used measured values for 18O and 2H isotope dilution spaces and estimated or measured values for insensible water losses yielded energy expenditure values (69.7 +/- 8.4 kcal/kg/d) that agreed most closely with energy balance data (70.3 +/- 11.9 kcal/kg/d). Equations in which we used a constant ratio of 1.03 between the 2H and 18O isotope dilution spaces resulted in energy expenditure values (66.3 +/- 10.2 kcal/kg/d) lower than those predicted by the energy balance data. Data analysis by nonlinear curve fitting compared to logarithmic transformation did not alter the estimates of energy expenditure obtained in these infants.

摘要

采用双标记水法对20名配方奶喂养的婴儿(10名1月龄婴儿和10名4月龄婴儿)的能量消耗进行了估算。然后,我们将能量消耗值与根据能量摄入和生长能量消耗计算得出的能量平衡值进行了比较。我们的目的是比较各种已发表的根据同位素数据计算二氧化碳呼出率(进而得出能量消耗值)的公式。那些我们使用18O和2H同位素稀释空间的测量值以及不显性失水量的估算值或测量值的公式得出的能量消耗值(69.7±8.4千卡/千克/天)与能量平衡数据(70.3±11.9千卡/千克/天)最为接近。那些我们在2H和18O同位素稀释空间之间使用1.03恒定比值的公式得出的能量消耗值(66.3±10.2千卡/千克/天)低于能量平衡数据预测的值。与对数转换相比,通过非线性曲线拟合进行的数据分析并未改变这些婴儿的能量消耗估算值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验