Suppr超能文献

明尼苏达州人类服务部对药物治疗管理项目的审计。

Minnesota Department of Human Services audit of medication therapy management programs.

机构信息

Ridgeview Chanhassen Clinic, 7907 Powers Blvd., Chanhassen, MN 55317, USA.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 May-Jun;53(3):248-53. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12165.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To inform medication therapy management (MTM) providers of findings of the Minnesota Department of Human Services review of claims submitted to Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP) for patients receiving MTM services and to discuss the impact of the audit on widespread MTM services and future audits.

METHODS

A retrospective review was completed on MTM claims submitted to MHCP from 2008 to 2010. The auditor verified that the Current Procedural Terminology codes billed matched the actual number of medications, conditions, and drug therapy problems assessed during an encounter.

RESULTS

190 claims were reviewed for 57 distinct pharmacies that billed for MTM services from 2008 to 2010, representing 4.5% of all claims submitted. The auditor reported that generally, the documentation within the electronic medical record had the least "up-coding" of all documentation systems. A total of 18 claims were coded at a higher level than appropriate, but only 10 notices were sent out to recover money because the others did not meet the minimum $50 threshold.

CONCLUSION

The auditor expressed concerns that a number of claims billed at the highest complexity level were only 15 minutes long. Providers will need to be cautious of the conditions that they bill as complex and of how they define drug therapy problems. Everything for which is being billed must be clearly assessed or rationalized in the documentation note. The auditor expressed that overall, documentation was well done; however, many MTM providers are now asking how to internally prepare for future audits.

摘要

目的

向药物治疗管理(MTM)提供者通报明尼苏达州人类服务部对向明尼苏达州医疗保健计划(MHCP)提交的接受 MTM 服务的患者的索赔进行的审查结果,并讨论该审计对广泛的 MTM 服务和未来审计的影响。

方法

对 2008 年至 2010 年向 MHCP 提交的 MTM 索赔进行了回顾性审查。审核员核实了向 MHCP 提交的 CPT 代码与在一次就诊中评估的实际药物数量、病情和药物治疗问题相匹配。

结果

对 2008 年至 2010 年向 MTM 服务收费的 57 家不同药房的 190 份索赔进行了审查,占提交的所有索赔的 4.5%。审核员报告说,一般来说,电子病历中的文档在所有文档系统中“向上编码”最少。共有 18 份索赔被编码为更高的级别,但只有 10 份通知被发出以收回资金,因为其他索赔没有达到 50 美元的最低门槛。

结论

审核员表示担心,许多按最高复杂程度计费的索赔只有 15 分钟长。提供者需要谨慎对待他们计费为复杂的病情,并谨慎定义药物治疗问题。计费的所有内容都必须在文档说明中进行明确评估或合理化。审核员表示,总体而言,文档做得很好;然而,许多 MTM 提供者现在都在询问如何为未来的内部审计做准备。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验