• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术用于疑似低风险子宫内膜癌患者手术分期的比较:日本的现状

Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.

作者信息

Deura Imari, Shimada Muneaki, Azuma Yukihiro, Komatsu Hiroaki, Nagira Kei, Sawada Mayumi, Harada Tasuku

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University Fucluty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugeo, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, 216-8511, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University Fucluty of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan; Department of Gynecology, Tohoku University Hospital, Seiryo-cho 1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.

出版信息

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;58(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019
PMID:30638490
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

National health insurance coverage for the laparoscopic staging surgery for patients with stage IA endometrial cancer started from April 2014 in Japan. We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the laparoscopic surgery for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer compared with those of the laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer, who were treated at Tottori University Hospital between 2005 and 2016, were eligible for this study. The laparoscopic staging surgery included only the pelvic lymphadenectomy and not the para-aortic lymphadenectomy. We evaluated the discrepancy between preoperative presumption and postoperative diagnosis of recurrent risk factors.

RESULTS

Forty patients underwent the laparoscopic surgery and 80 patients received the laparotomy. The laparoscopic surgery resulted in less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay. The operative time was significantly longer for the laparoscopic surgery compared with the laparotomy, but this difference was not seen in obese patients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m. The type of the surgical procedure did not affect the incidence of perioperative complications. Among 120 patients, 104 (86.6%) were diagnosed as FIGO stage IA, 118 (98.3%) with endometrioid adenocarcinoma grade 1 or 2, and 107 (89.1%) with myometrial invasion depth <50%.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic staging surgery is a feasible and safe alternative to the laparotomy for patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer, especially for obese patients. To perform the laparoscopic surgery for patients with stage IA endometrial cancer under the current national health insurance system, it is important to limit the candidates to low-risk disease based on a precise diagnosis before the surgery.

摘要

目的

日本自2014年4月起,为IA期子宫内膜癌患者的腹腔镜分期手术提供国民健康保险覆盖。我们进行了这项回顾性研究,以评估低风险子宫内膜癌患者腹腔镜手术与开腹手术相比的手术结果。

材料与方法

2005年至2016年期间在鸟取大学医院接受治疗的120例疑似低风险子宫内膜癌患者符合本研究条件。腹腔镜分期手术仅包括盆腔淋巴结清扫术,不包括腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。我们评估了复发危险因素术前推测与术后诊断之间的差异。

结果

40例患者接受了腹腔镜手术,80例患者接受了开腹手术。腹腔镜手术术中失血更少,住院时间更短。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术的手术时间明显更长,但在体重指数≥30kg/m的肥胖患者中未观察到这种差异。手术方式类型不影响围手术期并发症的发生率。120例患者中,104例(86.6%)被诊断为FIGO IA期,118例(98.3%)为子宫内膜样腺癌1级或2级,107例(89.1%)肌层浸润深度<50%。

结论

对于疑似低风险子宫内膜癌患者,尤其是肥胖患者,腹腔镜分期手术是开腹手术的一种可行且安全的替代方案。在当前国民健康保险制度下,为IA期子宫内膜癌患者进行腹腔镜手术时,重要的是在手术前基于精确诊断将手术候选人限制在低风险疾病患者。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术用于疑似低风险子宫内膜癌患者手术分期的比较:日本的现状
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;58(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019.
2
Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.全腹腔镜子宫切除术联合淋巴结清扫术在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中的评估
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):197-205. doi: 10.17772/gp/1563.
3
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
4
Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgical staging for early-stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜单部位与传统腹腔镜手术分期治疗早期子宫内膜癌。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Feb;24(2):358-63. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000046.
5
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 31;10(10):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub3.
6
Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.Telelap ALF-X与标准腹腔镜手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的单机构回顾性队列研究
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(3):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?肥胖子宫内膜癌女性的子宫切除术:腹腔镜手术还是开腹手术?
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):329-35. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5914.
8
Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic limphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer.肥胖的Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌女性患者行全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术加或不加盆腔淋巴结清扫术的可行性及发病率
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 May;279(5):655-60. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0790-5. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
9
Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.高危子宫内膜癌分期淋巴结清扫三种手术入路的比较
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Mar;136(3):315-319. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12073. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.腹腔镜检查与剖腹手术用于子宫内膜癌手术分期的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005 Aug;31(4):286-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00289.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:微创途径子宫切除术与开放手术的比较——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 13;16(10):1860. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101860.
2
A Review of Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Early-stage Endometrial Cancer: Extraperitoneal Approach May Have the Advantage over Intraperitoneal Approach.早期子宫内膜癌腹腔镜主动脉旁淋巴结切除术的综述:腹膜外入路可能比腹膜内入路更具优势。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):10-18. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_25_23. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
3
Additional low-pressure pulmonary recruitment for reducing post-laparoscopic shoulder pain in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
额外的低压肺复张术用于减轻妇科腹腔镜术后肩部疼痛:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Mar;67(2):253-260. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23197. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic and open hysterectomy on surgical site wound infections in patients with endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术对子宫内膜癌患者手术部位伤口感染影响的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep 24;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14415.
5
Laparoscopic vs. open procedure for intermediate‑ and high‑risk endometrial cancer: a minimum 4-year follow-up analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗中高危子宫内膜癌:至少 4 年随访分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 23;22(1):1203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10301-3.
6
Prognosis and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery on Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的预后和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 22;2022:9384134. doi: 10.1155/2022/9384134. eCollection 2022.
7
Volume Index is a Risk Factor for Recurrence Even in Patients with Clinical Stage IA Endometrial Cancer Undergoing either Laparotomy or Laparoscopy: A Retrospective Study.即使对于接受剖腹手术或腹腔镜手术的临床IA期子宫内膜癌患者,体积指数也是复发的一个危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 May 4;11(2):94-99. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_12_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
8
The current status of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in Japan.日本子宫内膜癌机器人手术的现状
Glob Health Med. 2022 Feb 28;4(1):21-25. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2021.01077.
9
Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001).腹腔镜手术在低危子宫内膜癌中的长期肿瘤安全性是否也适用于高中危患者?一项多中心土耳其妇科肿瘤学组对 2745 例子宫内膜癌病例进行的研究。(TRSGO-End-001)。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Oct 29;28(6):4328-4340. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060368.
10
Assessing the Effectiveness of a Weight Reduction Program in Hospitalized Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery.评估减重计划对接受腹腔镜手术的肥胖住院患者的有效性。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Jan 30;10(1):44-46. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_73_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.