Suppr超能文献

通过传统剖腹术、标准腹腔镜检查和机器人技术进行子宫内膜癌分期的结果与成本比较。

Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

作者信息

Bell Maria C, Torgerson Jenny, Seshadri-Kreaden Usha, Suttle Allison Wierda, Hunt Sharon

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sanford Women's Health, Sanford Clinic, Sioux Falls, SD 57105, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study purpose was to compare hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy completed via robotic assistance, laparotomy, and laparoscopy for endometrial cancer staging with respect to operative and peri-operative outcomes, complications, adequacy of staging, and cost.

METHODS

One hundred and ten patients underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging. All cases were performed by a single surgeon, at a single institution (40 robotic, 40 laparotomy, and 30 laparoscopic) and were retrospectively reviewed to compare demographics and peri-operative variables including, operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node count, hospital stay, complications, and return to normal activity. Additionally, a cost comparison between all three modalities was performed.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing robotic assisted hysterectomy and staging experienced longer operative time than the laparotomy cohort with no difference in comparison to the laparoscopic cohort (184 min, 108.6 min, 171 min, p<0.0001, p=0.14). Estimated blood loss was significantly reduced for the robotic cohort in comparison to the laparotomy cohort and comparable to laparoscopic cohort (166 cc, 316 cc, 253 cc, p=0.01, p=0.25). The complication rate was lowest in the robotic cohort (7.5%) relative to the laparotomy (27.5%) and laparoscopic cohorts (20%) (p=0.015, p=0.03). Average return to normal activity for the robotic patients was significantly shorter than those undergoing laparotomy (24.1 days versus 52 days, p<0.0001) and those undergoing laparoscopy (31.6 days, p=0.005). Lymph node retrieval did not differ between the 3 groups (robotic 17 nodes, laparotomy 14 nodes, laparoscopic 17 nodes). The total average cost for hysterectomy with staging completed via laparotomy was $12,943.60, for standard laparoscopy $7569.80, and for robotic assistance $8212.00. The difference in cost between laparotomy and robotic cohorts was significant p=0.0001 while there was no statistically significant difference in cost between laparoscopy and robotic cohorts p=0.06.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic hysterectomy provides comparable node retrieval to laparotomy and laparoscopic procedures in the case of the experienced laparoscopic surgeon. While robotic hysterectomy takes longer to perform than hysterectomy completed via laparotomy, it is equivalent to laparoscopic hysterectomy and provides the patient with a more expeditious return to normal activity with reduced post-operative morbidity. Additionally, the average cost for hysterectomy and staging was highest for laparotomy, followed by robotic, and least for standard laparoscopy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经机器人辅助、开腹手术和腹腔镜手术完成的子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术用于子宫内膜癌分期时在手术及围手术期结果、并发症、分期充分性和成本方面的差异。

方法

110例患者接受了子宫切除术及双侧输卵管卵巢切除术、盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术以进行子宫内膜癌分期。所有病例均由同一机构的同一位外科医生完成(机器人手术40例、开腹手术40例、腹腔镜手术30例),并进行回顾性分析以比较人口统计学和围手术期变量,包括手术时间、估计失血量、淋巴结计数、住院时间、并发症以及恢复正常活动的情况。此外,还对三种手术方式进行了成本比较。

结果

接受机器人辅助子宫切除术及分期的患者手术时间比开腹手术组更长,与腹腔镜手术组相比无差异(184分钟、108.6分钟、171分钟,p<0.0001,p=0.14)。与开腹手术组相比,机器人手术组的估计失血量显著减少,与腹腔镜手术组相当(166毫升、316毫升、253毫升,p=0.01,p=0.25)。机器人手术组的并发症发生率最低(7.5%),低于开腹手术组(27.5%)和腹腔镜手术组(20%)(p=0.015,p=0.03)。机器人手术患者恢复正常活动的平均时间明显短于开腹手术患者(24.1天对52天,p<0.0001)和腹腔镜手术患者(31.6天,p=0.005)。三组的淋巴结获取数量无差异(机器人手术组17个淋巴结、开腹手术组14个淋巴结、腹腔镜手术组17个淋巴结)。开腹手术完成分期的子宫切除术总平均成本为12,943.60美元,标准腹腔镜手术为7569.80美元,机器人辅助手术为8212.00美元。开腹手术组和机器人手术组之间的成本差异显著,p=0.0001,而腹腔镜手术组和机器人手术组之间的成本无统计学显著差异,p=0.06。

结论

对于经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生而言,机器人子宫切除术在淋巴结获取方面与开腹手术和腹腔镜手术相当。虽然机器人子宫切除术的手术时间比开腹子宫切除术长,但与腹腔镜子宫切除术相当,能使患者更快恢复正常活动,术后发病率降低。此外,子宫切除术及分期的平均成本开腹手术最高,其次是机器人手术,标准腹腔镜手术最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验