• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利福昔明与乳果糖在降低肝硬化患者显性肝性脑病复发率及住院率方面的疗效比较

Efficacy of rifaximin versus lactulose for reducing the recurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy and hopitalizations in cirrhosis.

作者信息

Irimia Roxana, Trifan Anca

机构信息

University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T. Popa - laşi.

出版信息

Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012 Oct-Dec;116(4):1021-7.

PMID:23700882
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Both rifaximin and lactulose have been reported to be effective for maintenance of remission from hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different treatment strategies for preventing recurrences and HE-related hospitalizations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight cirrhotic patients who recovered from HE were grouped according to one of the following therapies: rifaximin intermittently 14 days/month (RI- group), rifaximin 400 mg three times daily (RD-group) and lactulose 30 to 60 ml in 2 or 3 divided doses daily (L-group) for a 6-month period. The follow-up lasted 12 months. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the probability of developing recurrent overt HE episodes. The frequencies of HE- related hospitalizations in the three groups were evaluated comparatively.

RESULTS

Over a 12-month follow-up period, 10 (26.31 %) of 38 patients in the RI-group, 7 (25%) of 28 in the RD-group and 4 (33.33 %) of 12 in the L-group experienced recurrent bouts of HE, the differences not being significant. More L-group patients experienced more severe episodes of overt HE in spite of mild or moderate disease. In the rifaximin groups overt HE episodes were similarly frequent, and the severity of bouts was associated with Child-Pugh score. Fewer hospitalizations were reported in the rifaximin groups.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, rifaximin and lactulose are equally effective for the maintenance of remission from overt HE. However, rifaximin is superior for reducing the risk of HE-related hospitalization.

摘要

未标注

据报道,利福昔明和乳果糖对肝硬化患者肝性脑病(HE)缓解期的维持均有效。本研究旨在比较不同治疗策略预防复发及与HE相关住院的疗效。

材料与方法

78例从HE中康复的肝硬化患者,根据以下治疗方法之一分组:利福昔明每月间歇服用14天(RI组),利福昔明每日3次、每次400mg(RD组),乳果糖每日2或3次、每次30至60ml(L组),为期6个月。随访持续12个月。采用Kaplan-Meier分析确定发生复发性显性HE发作的概率。比较三组中与HE相关的住院频率。

结果

在12个月的随访期内,RI组38例患者中有10例(26.31%)、RD组28例患者中有7例(25%)、L组12例患者中有4例(33.33%)经历了HE复发,差异无统计学意义。尽管L组患者病情为轻度或中度,但更多患者经历了更严重的显性HE发作。在利福昔明组中,显性HE发作频率相似,发作严重程度与Child-Pugh评分相关。利福昔明组报告的住院次数较少。

结论

根据我们的数据,利福昔明和乳果糖在维持显性HE缓解方面同样有效。然而,利福昔明在降低与HE相关的住院风险方面更具优势。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of rifaximin versus lactulose for reducing the recurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy and hopitalizations in cirrhosis.利福昔明与乳果糖在降低肝硬化患者显性肝性脑病复发率及住院率方面的疗效比较
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012 Oct-Dec;116(4):1021-7.
2
Update on management of patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy.显性肝性脑病患者管理的最新进展。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2013 Aug;41(3):48-59. doi: 10.3810/hp.2013.08.1068.
3
A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing rifaximin plus lactulose with lactulose alone in treatment of overt hepatic encephalopathy.一项比较利福昔明联合乳果糖与单用乳果糖治疗显性肝性脑病的随机、双盲、对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1458-63. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.219. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
4
Durability of rifaximin response in hepatic encephalopathy.利福昔明治疗肝性脑病的持久性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb;46(2):168-71. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318231faae.
5
Randomised clinical trial: rifaximin improves health-related quality of life in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy - a double-blind placebo-controlled study.随机临床试验:利福昔明改善肝性脑病肝硬化患者的健康相关生活质量 - 一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;34(8):853-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04808.x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
6
Primary prophylaxis of overt hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: an open labeled randomized controlled trial of lactulose versus no lactulose.肝硬化患者显性肝性脑病的一级预防:乳果糖与无乳果糖的开放性标签随机对照试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;27(8):1329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07186.x.
7
RiMINI - the influence of rifaximin on minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and on the intestinal microbiome in patients with liver cirrhosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.利福昔明对肝硬化患者轻微肝性脑病(MHE)及肠道微生物群的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Feb 29;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1205-8.
8
Comparison of Rifaximin Plus Lactulose with the Lactulose Alone for the Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy.利福昔明联合乳果糖与单用乳果糖治疗肝性脑病的比较。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2017 Aug;65(8):42-46.
9
Management of hepatic encephalopathy in the hospital.医院中肝性脑病的管理。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Feb;89(2):241-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
10
Secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: an open-label, randomized controlled trial of lactulose, probiotics, and no therapy.肝硬化肝性脑病的二级预防:乳果糖、益生菌和无治疗的开放性、随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1043-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.113. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term management of hepatic encephalopathy with lactulose and/or rifaximin: a review of the evidence.乳果糖和/或利福昔明对肝性脑病的长期管理:证据综述
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;31(4):434-450. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001311.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rifaximin-α administration for the reduction of episodes of overt hepatic encephalopathy in recurrence compared with standard treatment in France.在法国,与标准治疗相比,利福昔明-α给药用于减少显性肝性脑病复发发作的成本效益分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;9(4):473-82. doi: 10.1177/1756283X16644249. Epub 2016 May 1.
3
Management options in decompensated cirrhosis.
失代偿期肝硬化的管理方案
Hepat Med. 2015 Jul 15;7:43-50. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S62463. eCollection 2015.
4
Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of rifaximin for hepatic encephalopathy.利福昔明用于肝性脑病的安全性、有效性及患者可接受性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Mar 18;8:331-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S41565. eCollection 2014.