Suppr超能文献

即时和延迟自由回忆中的间隔效应。

The spacing effect in immediate and delayed free recall.

作者信息

Godbole Namrata R, Delaney Peter F, Verkoeijen Peter P J L

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , The University of North Carolina at Greensboro , NC , USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2014;22(5):462-9. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.798416. Epub 2013 May 23.

Abstract

Spacing repetitions improves learning relative to massing repetitions (the spacing effect). While most studies have examined the spacing effect at short retention intervals, there are contradictory claims about its fate at a delay. Certain empirical findings suggest that the spacing effect persists at a delay. However, a recent theoretical account proposes that in free recall the spacing effect should disappear at a delay. The few studies that have examined the spacing effect at a delay are sub-optimally designed, preventing an unbiased conclusion. The current study used incidental learning and controlled recency and encoding strategy in order to examine the effect of delay on the recall of spaced items within a free recall paradigm. The results demonstrated that the spacing effect persists after a delay. The results point to an important dissociation between intentional forgetting and context-change designs (which produce more forgetting of spaced than massed items) and the passage of time (which produces similar forgetting of spaced and massed items).

摘要

相对于集中重复,间隔重复能提高学习效果(间隔效应)。虽然大多数研究考察了短保持间隔下的间隔效应,但关于其在延迟情况下的结果存在相互矛盾的说法。某些实证研究结果表明,间隔效应在延迟后依然存在。然而,最近的一种理论观点认为,在自由回忆中,间隔效应在延迟后应该会消失。少数考察延迟情况下间隔效应的研究设计并不理想,无法得出无偏结论。本研究采用附带学习并控制近因效应和编码策略,以检验延迟对自由回忆范式中间隔项目回忆的影响。结果表明,间隔效应在延迟后依然存在。这些结果表明,有意遗忘和情境变化设计(会导致间隔项目比集中项目遗忘更多)与时间推移(会导致间隔项目和集中项目遗忘程度相似)之间存在重要的分离。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验