Verkoeijen Peter P J L, Rikers Remy M J P, Schmidt Henk G
Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O.Box 1738, NL-3000 DR, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):796-800. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.796.
Two experiments were conducted to determine the mechanism underlying the spacing effect in free-recall tasks. Participants were required to study a list containing once-presented words as well as massed and spaced repetitions. In both experiments, presentation background at repetition was manipulated. The results of Experiment 1 demonstrated that free recall was higher for massed items repeated in a different context than for massed items repeated in the same context, whereas free recall for spaced items was higher when repeated in the same context. Furthermore, a spacing effect was shown for words repeated in the same context, whereas an attenuated spacing effect was revealed for words repeated in a different context. These findings were replicated in Experiment 2 under a different presentation background manipulation. Both experiments seem to be most consistent with a model that combines the contextual variability and the study-phase retrieval mechanism to account for the spacing effect in free-recall tasks.
进行了两项实验以确定自由回忆任务中间隔效应背后的机制。要求参与者学习一个包含单次呈现的单词以及集中重复和间隔重复的列表。在两个实验中,都对重复时的呈现背景进行了操控。实验1的结果表明,在不同背景下重复的集中呈现项目的自由回忆率高于在相同背景下重复的集中呈现项目,而间隔呈现项目在相同背景下重复时的自由回忆率更高。此外,在相同背景下重复的单词显示出间隔效应,而在不同背景下重复的单词则显示出减弱的间隔效应。在实验2中,在不同的呈现背景操控下重复了这些发现。两个实验似乎都与一个结合了情境变异性和学习阶段检索机制的模型最为一致,以解释自由回忆任务中的间隔效应。