Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Sleep Res. 2013 Oct;22(5):593-9. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12057. Epub 2013 May 24.
The masticatory central pattern generator (CPG) may be implicated in the pathophysiology of sleep bruxism (SB). The aim of this study was to compare rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA) occurring during sleep related to SB with that of natural voluntary chewing in a sample of sleep bruxers. It was hypothesized that the pace of RMMA during sleep is correlated with the chewing pace. Electromyographic (EMG) surface activity was recorded unilaterally from the masseter muscle of 13 participants diagnosed with SB (mean age ± standard deviation =26.1 ± 9.0 years) by means of portable recorders. For each participant, recordings were carried out in the natural environment setting, always including the dinner time and the entire sleeping period. The time-frequency features of RMMA episodes were extracted automatically offline using a previously validated algorithm. Comparisons between chewing and SB activity indicated that chewing RMMA episodes almost doubled sleep RMMA in duration and power. The mean frequency of SB episodes was 1.0 ± 0.3 Hz, whereas the mean frequency of chewing episodes was 1.5 ± 0.4 Hz. The pace of SB and that of chewing were not correlated significantly (R = -0.13; P = 0.96). We conclude that sleep RMMA is not related to that of chewing. Despite both activities being accompanied by rhythmic jaw contractions, the pace-generating mechanism of SB may be independent from that of chewing.
咀嚼中枢模式发生器(CPG)可能与睡眠磨牙症(SB)的病理生理学有关。本研究旨在比较睡眠相关 SB 时出现的节律性咀嚼肌活动(RMMA)与磨牙者自然自愿咀嚼时的 RMMA。假设睡眠期间 RMMA 的节奏与咀嚼节奏相关。通过便携式记录器,从 13 名被诊断为 SB(平均年龄 ± 标准差=26.1 ± 9.0 岁)的参与者的一侧咀嚼肌记录肌电图(EMG)表面活动。对于每个参与者,在自然环境设置中进行记录,始终包括晚餐时间和整个睡眠时间。使用先前验证的算法自动离线提取 RMMA 发作的时频特征。咀嚼和 SB 活动之间的比较表明,咀嚼 RMMA 发作的持续时间和功率几乎是睡眠 RMMA 的两倍。SB 发作的平均频率为 1.0 ± 0.3 Hz,而咀嚼发作的平均频率为 1.5 ± 0.4 Hz。SB 和咀嚼的节奏没有显著相关(R = -0.13;P = 0.96)。我们得出结论,睡眠 RMMA 与咀嚼无关。尽管这两种活动都伴随着节律性的下颌收缩,但 SB 的节奏产生机制可能与咀嚼无关。