Suppr超能文献

多学科癌症困扰筛查问卷的验证与实际应用。

Validation and practical implementation of a multidisciplinary cancer distress screening questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Jul;189(7):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00066-013-0348-8. Epub 2013 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to identify cancer patients with psychosocial needs during radiotherapy, a routine screening questionnaire is widely recommended in the literature. Several tools focusing mainly on psychological issues have been developed during the past decade. However, problems with their implementation into clinical routine have been repeatedly reported, due to a lack of practicability for clinicians and nurses. This study reports the compilation of a multidisciplinary screening questionnaire and an analysis of the effectiveness of its implementation into clinical routine at the Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The screening questionnaire is based on a compilation of several subscales from established and validated assessment tools. It focuses on comprehensive information with high a clinical relevance for all professions. In a pilot study, patients' acceptance was assessed qualitatively. Analysis of missing screening data in consecutively admitted patients reflects the effectiveness of implementation and representativity of the data. A validation analysis of the psychological subscales was performed using external criteria and its internal consistency was tested with Cronbachs' α.

RESULTS

Qualitative patient acceptance of the screening questionnaire is good. The overall response rate in the screening procedure was 75 %. Missing patient screening data sets arose randomly-mainly due to organizational problems-and did not result in systematic errors. The psychological subscales identify highly distressed patients with a sensitivity of 89 and 78 %, and an internal consistency of 0.843 and 0.617.

CONCLUSION

The multidisciplinary screening questionnaire compiled in this study has a high patient acceptance, provides reliable and representative data and identifies highly distressed patients with excellent sensitivity. Although requiring additional personnel resources, it can be implemented successfully in clinical routine with benefits for both the patient and the professional team.

摘要

背景

为了在放疗期间识别有心理社会需求的癌症患者,文献中广泛推荐使用常规筛查问卷。在过去十年中,已经开发出了几种主要关注心理问题的工具。然而,由于临床医生和护士的实用性不足,其实施到临床常规中存在问题。本研究报告了一个多学科筛查问卷的编制,并分析了在维也纳医科大学放射治疗科将其实施到临床常规中的效果。

材料和方法

该筛查问卷是基于几个已建立和验证的评估工具的子量表的组合。它侧重于对所有专业人员都具有高度临床相关性的全面信息。在一项试点研究中,从定性的角度评估了患者的接受程度。对连续入院患者缺失筛查数据的分析反映了实施的有效性和数据的代表性。使用外部标准对心理子量表进行了验证分析,并使用 Cronbach's α 检验了其内部一致性。

结果

患者对筛查问卷的接受程度良好。筛查过程中的总体响应率为 75%。缺失患者筛查数据集是随机出现的,主要是由于组织问题,并没有导致系统错误。心理子量表能够识别出高度困扰的患者,其敏感性为 89%和 78%,内部一致性为 0.843 和 0.617。

结论

本研究编制的多学科筛查问卷具有较高的患者接受度,提供可靠且具有代表性的数据,并能以优异的敏感性识别出高度困扰的患者。尽管需要额外的人员资源,但它可以成功地在临床常规中实施,为患者和专业团队都带来益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验