• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测痛苦及相关情绪障碍的常见筛查方法的可接受性——癌症专科医生和非专科医生的偏好

Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders-preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists.

作者信息

Mitchell Alex J, Kaar Stephen, Coggan Chris, Herdman Joanne

机构信息

Liaison Psychiatry, University of Leicester, Brandon Unit, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2008 Mar;17(3):226-36. doi: 10.1002/pon.1228.

DOI:10.1002/pon.1228
PMID:17575565
Abstract

A new questionnaire of clinicians' attitudes and practices in relation to screening for mood disorder was distributed to 300 cancer professionals (specialists and non-specialists) working across the UK. From 226 (75.3%) health professionals working in cancer care who responded, approximately two-thirds always or regularly attempted to detect mood disorder during consultations but a substantial minority relied on patients spontaneously mentioning an emotional issue. The highest rate of routine questioning was performed by clinicians working in palliative medicine (76.3%) as well as nurse specialists working in all areas (72%). Despite these relatively high rates of enquiry, 10% or less of all specialists used a validated questionnaire, most preferring to rely on their own clinical skills or recalling the two simple questions of the short Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2). Staff suggested that ideal screening practice was to use one, two or three simple questions or a short validated questionnaire but not to refer to a specialist for a diagnosis. The main barrier to successful screening was lack of time but insufficient training and low confidence were also influential. Once distress was detected, 90% of nurses but only 40% of doctors were prepared to give distressed patients as much time as they needed. Predictors of clinicians' willingness to use more advanced screening methods were length of follow-up appointments and time clinicians were prepared to spend detecting distress. We suggest that future field studies of screening tools should also measure the issue of acceptability.

摘要

一份关于临床医生在情绪障碍筛查方面的态度和做法的新问卷被分发给了全英国300名癌症专业人员(专科医生和非专科医生)。在回复问卷的226名(75.3%)从事癌症护理工作的卫生专业人员中,约三分之二的人在会诊时总是或经常试图检测情绪障碍,但相当一部分人依赖患者自发提及情绪问题。在姑息医学领域工作的临床医生(76.3%)以及所有领域的护士专科医生(72%)进行常规询问的比例最高。尽管询问率相对较高,但所有专科医生中只有10%或更少的人使用经过验证的问卷,大多数人更愿意依靠自己的临床技能或回忆简短的患者健康问卷(PHQ2)中的两个简单问题。工作人员建议,理想的筛查做法是使用一、两个或三个简单问题或一份简短的经过验证的问卷,而不是转诊给专科医生进行诊断。成功筛查的主要障碍是时间不足,但培训不足和信心不足也有影响。一旦发现患者有困扰,90%的护士愿意给予困扰患者所需的时间,但只有40%的医生愿意这样做。临床医生愿意使用更先进筛查方法的预测因素是随访预约的时长以及临床医生准备用于检测困扰的时间。我们建议,未来筛查工具的实地研究也应衡量可接受性问题。

相似文献

1
Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders-preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists.用于检测痛苦及相关情绪障碍的常见筛查方法的可接受性——癌症专科医生和非专科医生的偏好
Psychooncology. 2008 Mar;17(3):226-36. doi: 10.1002/pon.1228.
2
Affective syndromes and their screening in cancer patients with early and stable disease: Italian ICD-10 data and performance of the Distress Thermometer from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study (SEPOS).早期病情稳定的癌症患者的情感综合征及其筛查:意大利国际疾病分类第10版数据以及来自南欧心理肿瘤学研究(SEPOS)的苦恼温度计的性能
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
3
Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders.38项关于苦恼温度计及其他检测癌症相关情绪障碍的超短方法准确性分析的汇总结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4670-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0438. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
4
Beyond communication: the development of a training program for hospital and hospice staff in the detection and management of psychological distress--preliminary results.超越沟通:为医院和临终关怀机构的员工制定心理困扰识别和管理培训计划的进展——初步结果。
Palliat Support Care. 2010 Mar;8(1):27-33. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990678. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
5
Medical doctors profile in Ethiopia: production, attrition and retention. In memory of 100-years Ethiopian modern medicine & the new Ethiopian millennium.埃塞俄比亚医生概况:培养、流失与留存。纪念埃塞俄比亚现代医学百年及新千年。
Ethiop Med J. 2008 Jan;46 Suppl 1:1-77.
6
Clinical utility of screening for clinical depression and bipolar disorder.临床抑郁症和双相情感障碍筛查的临床实用性。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32834de45b.
7
Factors influencing men undertaking active surveillance for the management of low-risk prostate cancer.影响男性对低风险前列腺癌进行主动监测管理的因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Jan;36(1):89-96. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.89-96.
8
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.家庭医疗中三种家庭暴力筛查方法的随机对照比较
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):430-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.716.
9
[Model program for screening oral cancers in the Roma population].[罗姆人口口腔癌筛查示范项目]
Magy Onkol. 2007;51(2):95-101. Epub 2007 Jul 29.
10
Screening for mental disorders in laryngeal cancer patients: a comparison of 6 methods.喉癌患者精神障碍的筛查:六种方法的比较
Psychooncology. 2008 Mar;17(3):280-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.1229.

引用本文的文献

1
The development and psychometric evaluation of specific problem lists reflecting psychosocial distress of patients before and after solid organ transplantation.反映实体器官移植前后患者心理社会困扰的特定问题清单的编制及心理测量学评估。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 13;16:1481641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1481641. eCollection 2025.
2
Pilot implementation of two specific problem lists before and after solid organ transplantation into routine care.在实体器官移植前后,将两个特定问题清单初步应用于常规护理中。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 17;15:1481643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1481643. eCollection 2024.
3
Utility and Implementation of the Distress Thermometer for Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.
癌症患者苦恼温度计的效用与实施:来自沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 29;16(3):e57187. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57187. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Should I call psycho-oncology? Training nurses on psycho-oncological screening reduces uncertainties.我应该咨询心理肿瘤学吗?对护士进行心理肿瘤学筛查培训可以减少不确定性。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10585-10592. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04936-3. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Anxiety, Depression, and Stress Reaction/Adjustment Disorders and Their Associations with Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Newly Diagnosed Patients With Breast Cancer.焦虑、抑郁和应激反应/适应障碍及其与新诊断乳腺癌患者医疗资源利用和成本的关联
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Mar 28;10(1):68-76. doi: 10.36469/001c.70238. eCollection 2023.
6
Preexisting psychological illness and its association with mortality in lung cancer patients with access to support resources.有支持资源可及的肺癌患者中,预先存在的心理疾病及其与死亡率的关系。
Clin Respir J. 2022 Nov;16(11):750-755. doi: 10.1111/crj.13547. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
7
A Framework for Automating Psychiatric Distress Screening in Ophthalmology Clinics Using an EHR-Derived AI Algorithm.一种使用电子健康记录衍生的人工智能算法在眼科诊所实现精神痛苦筛查自动化的框架。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 3;11(10):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.10.6.
8
Study protocol: the OptiScreen-Study: optimized psycho-oncological care-from screening to intervention.研究方案:OptiScreen-Study 研究:优化心理肿瘤学护理——从筛查到干预。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar;149(3):1343-1354. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04368-5. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
9
What if… I Asked Cancer Patients About Psychological Distress? Barriers in Psycho-Oncological Screening From the Perspective of Nurses-A Qualitative Analysis.如果……我询问癌症患者心理困扰情况会怎样?从护士视角看心理肿瘤学筛查中的障碍——一项定性分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 26;12:786691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.786691. eCollection 2021.
10
Development, acceptability and uptake of an on-line communication skills education program targeting challenging conversations for oncology health professionals related to identifying and responding to anxiety and depression.开发、可接受性和采用针对肿瘤学医疗专业人员进行具有挑战性的沟通技巧教育计划,以识别和应对焦虑和抑郁。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 31;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07521-5.