• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童福利绩效衡量的背景。

The context of child welfare performance measures.

作者信息

Carnochan Sarah, Samples Mark, Lawson Jennifer, Austin Michael J

机构信息

Bay Area Social Services Consortium, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-7400, USA.

出版信息

J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):147-60. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788946.

DOI:10.1080/15433714.2013.788946
PMID:23705647
Abstract

A growing movement in the United States seeks to improve the outcomes achieved by public agencies through performance measurement strategies. In child welfare policy, a federally mandated performance measurement system has evolved since the 1980s, establishing the federal Child and Family Services Review which uses a series of performance indicators for evaluating the child welfare system. This article reviews the literature on performance measurement and performance management in the public sector in order to develop a conceptual framework for examining the federal child welfare performance measurement system. It briefly summarizes the evolution of federal policy related to performance measurement in child welfare. The framework is then used to guide an analysis of the debate surrounding the establishment of the current child welfare performance measurement system, concluding with recommendations for consideration in future reform efforts.

摘要

美国一项日益壮大的运动旨在通过绩效衡量策略来改善公共机构所取得的成果。在儿童福利政策方面,自20世纪80年代以来,一个由联邦政府强制推行的绩效衡量系统逐渐发展起来,建立了联邦儿童与家庭服务审查制度,该制度使用一系列绩效指标来评估儿童福利系统。本文回顾了关于公共部门绩效衡量和绩效管理的文献,以便构建一个用于审视联邦儿童福利绩效衡量系统的概念框架。文章简要总结了儿童福利领域与绩效衡量相关的联邦政策的演变。然后,该框架被用于指导对围绕当前儿童福利绩效衡量系统建立的争论进行分析,并在最后提出了一些建议,以供未来改革时考虑。

相似文献

1
The context of child welfare performance measures.儿童福利绩效衡量的背景。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):147-60. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788946.
2
Using performance measures to manage child welfare outcomes: local strategies and decision making.运用绩效指标管理儿童福利成果:地方策略与决策
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):254-64. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788954.
3
Achieving placement stability.实现植入稳定性。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):235-53. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788953.
4
Achieving exits to permanency for children in long term care.为长期照料中的儿童实现永久性安置。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):220-34. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788952.
5
Preventing the recurrence of maltreatment.预防虐待行为的复发。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):161-78. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788947.
6
Achieving timely adoption.及时采用。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):210-9. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788950.
7
Understanding and measuring child welfare outcomes.理解和衡量儿童福利成果。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5(1-2):135-56. doi: 10.1300/J394v05n01_06.
8
Achieving timely reunification.实现及时统一。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):179-95. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788948.
9
Preventing re-entry to foster care.防止再次进入寄养照料系统。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):196-209. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788949.
10
Can public agencies do no wrong? Liability of child-serving agencies.公共机构就不会犯错吗?儿童服务机构的责任。
Child Welfare. 1982 Nov-Dec;61(8):585-92.

引用本文的文献

1
When opinions differ: the development of a reflection tool for youth professionals to support shared decision-making with parents.当意见出现分歧时:为青年专业人员开发一种反思工具,以支持与家长共同做出决策。
Eur J Soc Work. 2022 Mar 8;26(2):389-400. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2022.2040436. eCollection 2023.