Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jun;110(6):450-456.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 May 2.
Ragweed is an important cause of allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis (AR/C) in North America and elsewhere. Allergen immunotherapy enabling safe patient self-administration is considered an unmet clinical need. Allergy immunotherapy tablet (AIT) treatment has shown promising efficacy and safety for grass allergy but has not been assessed for ragweed allergy.
To evaluate efficacy and safety of 2 short ragweed AIT doses in patients with AR/C.
Adults with ragweed pollen-induced AR/C were randomized 1:1:1 to daily ragweed AIT (6 or 12 Amb a 1 units) or placebo before, throughout, and after ragweed season (approximately 52 weeks). Patients could use predefined allergy rescue medications in season. Efficacy end points included peak and entire season total combined score (TCS) and its components daily symptom score (DSS), and daily medication score (DMS). Safety assessments included adverse events.
A total of 565 patients were randomized. During peak season, the 6- and 12-Amb a 1 unit ragweed AIT doses showed 21% (-1.76 score) and 27% (-2.24 score) improvement in TCS vs placebo (P < .05). The 6- and 12-Amb a 1 unit AIT doses significantly improved DSS and DMS vs placebo (P < .05). Peak and entire season efficacy were comparable. The 12-Amb a 1 unit AIT dose reduced peak-season TCS vs placebo by 21% and 25% in subgroups with and without local application-site reactions, respectively. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild, oral reactions; no systemic allergic reactions were reported. One patient in the 6-Amb a 1 unit group received epinephrine at an emergency facility for sensation of localized pharyngeal edema.
In this trial, ragweed AIT was effective and well tolerated in ragweed-allergic North American adults.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00783198.
豚草是引起北美和其他地区变应性鼻炎伴或不伴结膜炎(AR/C)的一个重要原因。过敏原免疫疗法使患者能够安全地自我给药,被认为是一种未满足的临床需求。花粉过敏免疫治疗片剂(AIT)治疗已显示出对草过敏的良好疗效和安全性,但尚未对豚草过敏进行评估。
评估 2 种短豚草 AIT 剂量在 AR/C 患者中的疗效和安全性。
在豚草花粉诱发的 AR/C 患者中,按照 1:1:1 的比例随机分配,每天接受豚草 AIT(6 或 12 个 Amb a 1 单位)或安慰剂,在豚草季节前、期间和之后(约 52 周)。患者可以在季节中使用预定义的过敏缓解药物。疗效终点包括峰值和整个季节的总联合评分(TCS)及其成分(每日症状评分(DSS)和每日药物评分(DMS)。安全性评估包括不良事件。
共有 565 名患者被随机分配。在峰值季节,6-Amb a 1 单位和 12-Amb a 1 单位的豚草 AIT 剂量分别改善了 21%(-1.76 分)和 27%(-2.24 分)的 TCS,与安慰剂相比(P <.05)。6-Amb a 1 单位和 12-Amb a 1 单位的 AIT 剂量均显著改善了 DSS 和 DMS,与安慰剂相比(P <.05)。峰值和整个季节的疗效相当。12-Amb a 1 单位的 AIT 剂量在有和没有局部应用部位反应的亚组中,分别降低了 21%和 25%的峰值季节 TCS。大多数与治疗相关的不良事件是轻微的口腔反应;没有报告全身性过敏反应。1 名 6-Amb a 1 单位组的患者因局部咽部水肿的感觉而在急救设施中接受了肾上腺素治疗。
在这项试验中,豚草 AIT 在北美豚草过敏的成年患者中是有效且耐受良好的。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00783198。