Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 22;59(21):1861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.045.
The purpose of this study was to examine temporal trends in post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bleeding among patients with elective PCI, unstable angina (UA)/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
The impact of bleeding avoidance strategies on post-PCI bleeding rates over time is unknown.
Using the CathPCI Registry, we examined temporal trends in post-PCI bleeding from 2005 to 2009 among patients with elective PCI (n = 599,524), UA/NSTEMI (n = 836,103), and STEMI (n = 267,632). We quantified the linear time trend in bleeding using 3 sequential logistic regression models: 1) clinical factors; 2) clinical + vascular access strategies (femoral vs. radial, use of closure devices); and 3) clinical, vascular strategies + antithrombotic treatments (anticoagulant ± glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor [GPI]). Changes in the odds ratio for time trend in bleeding were compared using bootstrapping and converted to risk ratio.
An approximate 20% reduction in post-PCI bleeding was seen (elective PCI: 1.4% to 1.1%; UA/NSTEMI: 2.3% to 1.8; STEMI: 4.9% to 4.5%). Radial approach remained low (<3%), and closure device use increased marginally from 44% to 49%. Bivalirudin use increased (17% to 30%), whereas any heparin + GPI decreased (41% to 28%). There was a significant 6% to 8% per year reduction in annual bleeding risk in UA/NSTEMI and elective PCI, but not in STEMI. Antithrombotic strategies were associated with roughly half of the reduction in annual bleeding risk: change in risk ratio from 7.5% to 4% for elective PCI, and 5.7% to 2.8% for UA/NSTEMI (both p <0.001).
The nearly 20% reduction in post-PCI bleeding over time was largely due to temporal changes in antithrombotic strategies. Further reductions in bleeding complications may be possible as bleeding avoidance strategies evolve, especially in STEMI.
本研究旨在探讨择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、不稳定型心绞痛(UA)/非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者 PCI 后出血的时间趋势。
尚不清楚随着时间的推移,出血预防策略对 PCI 后出血率的影响。
利用 CathPCI 注册研究,我们分析了 2005 年至 2009 年择期 PCI(n=599524)、UA/NSTEMI(n=836103)和 STEMI(n=267632)患者 PCI 后出血的时间趋势。我们使用 3 个连续的逻辑回归模型来量化出血的线性时间趋势:1)临床因素;2)临床+血管入路策略(股动脉与桡动脉、使用封堵装置);3)临床、血管策略+抗血栓治疗(抗凝±糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂[GPI])。通过自举法比较时间趋势出血比值比的变化,并转换为风险比。
PCI 后出血率下降约 20%(择期 PCI:1.4%降至 1.1%;UA/NSTEMI:2.3%降至 1.8%;STEMI:4.9%降至 4.5%)。桡动脉入路仍较低(<3%),封堵装置使用率从 44%略微增至 49%。比伐卢定使用率增加(17%增至 30%),而肝素+GPI 使用率下降(41%降至 28%)。UA/NSTEMI 和择期 PCI 的年出血风险每年降低 6%至 8%,但 STEMI 则不然。抗血栓治疗策略与每年出血风险降低的幅度大致相当:择期 PCI 的风险比从 7.5%降至 4%,UA/NSTEMI 的风险比从 5.7%降至 2.8%(均 P<0.001)。
随着时间的推移,PCI 后出血率下降近 20%,主要归因于抗血栓治疗策略的变化。随着出血预防策略的不断发展,出血并发症可能会进一步减少,尤其是在 STEMI 中。