• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性腕管松解术后单间断缝合与多纳蒂缝合的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验

Single interrupted sutures compared with Donati sutures after open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomised trial.

作者信息

Bolster Mireille, Schipper Carlijn, Van Sterkenburg Steven, Ruettermann Mike, Reijnen Michel

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013 Sep;47(4):289-91. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2012.762006. Epub 2013 May 28.

DOI:10.3109/2000656X.2012.762006
PMID:23710789
Abstract

Inversion of the wound edges is one of the potential causes of postoperative scar tenderness after open carpal tunnel release. When using vertical mattress sutures (also named Donati sutures), inversion of wound edges is less likely to occur compared with single interrupted sutures. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of both sutures after open carpal tunnel release and assess their effects on scar tenderness and functional outcome. A prospective randomised controlled trial was performed comparing single interrupted and Donati sutures. Eighty-nine hands were included in the study. Eight weeks postoperatively, scar formation was nice/very nice in 94% (single stitches) and 97% (Donati stitches) of the patients. Pain and disability scores were, in both groups, improved 8 weeks postoperatively, although the patients receiving Donati sutures had a 2-fold higher pain score. In conclusion, both Donati and single stitches are related to excellent scar formation. The Donati sutures are related to more prolonged postoperative pain.

摘要

伤口边缘内翻是开放性腕管松解术后瘢痕压痛的潜在原因之一。与单间断缝合相比,使用垂直褥式缝合(也称为多纳蒂缝合)时,伤口边缘内翻的可能性较小。本研究的目的是比较开放性腕管松解术后两种缝合方法的使用情况,并评估它们对瘢痕压痛和功能结局的影响。进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较单间断缝合和多纳蒂缝合。89只手纳入研究。术后8周,94%(单缝)和97%(多纳蒂缝)的患者瘢痕形成良好/非常好。两组患者术后8周疼痛和残疾评分均有所改善,尽管接受多纳蒂缝合的患者疼痛评分高出2倍。总之,多纳蒂缝合和单缝均与良好的瘢痕形成有关。多纳蒂缝合与术后疼痛持续时间较长有关。

相似文献

1
Single interrupted sutures compared with Donati sutures after open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomised trial.开放性腕管松解术后单间断缝合与多纳蒂缝合的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013 Sep;47(4):289-91. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2012.762006. Epub 2013 May 28.
2
Randomised controlled study of two different techniques of skin suture in endoscopic release of carpal tunnel.两种不同皮肤缝合技术用于腕管内镜松解术的随机对照研究
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(6):335-8. doi: 10.1080/02844310902955763.
3
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.
4
Double- versus single-incision technique for open carpal tunnel release.开放式腕管松解术的双切口与单切口技术
Orthopedics. 2009 Oct;32(10). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090818-14.
5
Standard open decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome compared with a modified open technique preserving the superficial skin nerves: a prospective randomized study.腕管综合征标准开放式减压术与保留浅表皮神经的改良开放式技术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Nov;31(9):1483-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.07.018.
6
Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial.比较皮下潜行技术与 Donati 技术在腕管切开术中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Sep 17;16(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0.
7
Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release.比较可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线用于开放性腕管松解术的前瞻性随机试验。
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Feb;30(1):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.10.009.
8
Five-year follow-up of carpal tunnel release in patients over age 65.65岁以上患者腕管松解术的五年随访
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Feb;35(2):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.020. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
9
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using a new median nerve protector.使用新型正中神经保护器的内镜下腕管松解术。
Arthroscopy. 2004 Oct;20(8):841-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.031.
10
Cosmetic results of lower midline abdominal incision: Donati stitches versus a continuous intracutaneous suture in a randomized clinical trial.下腹部正中切口的美容效果:一项随机临床试验中多纳蒂缝合法与连续皮内缝合法的比较
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(8):955-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340500433059.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of the Tissue Adhesive Material as a Surgical Wound-Closure Technique Following Carpal Tunnel Decompression on Neurological and Functional Outcomes: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.腕管减压术后使用组织黏合材料作为手术伤口闭合技术对神经和功能结局的影响:一项单中心随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Jan 31;16(1):e53312. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53312. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
A Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Material and Suture as Wound-Closure Techniques following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Single-Center Randomized Control Trial.腕管减压术后组织黏合材料与缝线作为伤口闭合技术的比较:一项单中心随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 14;12(8):2864. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082864.
3
Including a Vessel Loop in Wound Closure Facilitates Suture Removal Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release.
在腕管松解术后的伤口闭合中包含一个血管环有助于拆线。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jan;18(1_suppl):84S-90S. doi: 10.1177/15589447221092062. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
4
Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial.比较皮下潜行技术与 Donati 技术在腕管切开术中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Sep 17;16(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0.
5
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.