• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do patients' information requirements for choice in health care vary with their socio-demographic characteristics?患者在医疗保健选择方面的信息需求是否会因其社会人口特征而有所不同?
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1127-38. doi: 10.1111/hex.12086. Epub 2013 May 28.
2
Are patients' preferences regarding the place of treatment heard and addressed at the point of referral: an exploratory study based on observations of GP-patient consultations.患者对于治疗地点的偏好是否在转诊时得到倾听和重视:一项基于全科医生-患者咨询观察的探索性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Dec 10;14:189. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-189.
3
Hospital choice in Germany from the patient's perspective: a cross-sectional study.从患者角度看德国的医院选择:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2712-3.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Selecting a provider: what factors influence patients' decision making?选择医疗机构:哪些因素影响患者的决策?
J Healthc Manag. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(2):99-114; discussion 114-5.
6
When do people choose to be informed? Predictors of information-seeking in the choice of primary care provider in Sweden.人们何时选择获取信息?瑞典选择初级保健提供者时信息寻求的预测因素。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Apr;15(2):210-224. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000373. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
7
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
8
Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment.全科医生了解患者的偏好吗?使用离散选择实验对代理关系进行总体层面的实证研究。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
Patient trade-offs between continuity and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics in Canada: a cross-sectional survey using discrete choice experiment.加拿大初级保健跨专业教学诊所中患者在连续性和可及性之间的权衡:使用离散选择实验的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023578.
10
Patients' experience of choosing an outpatient clinic in one county in Denmark: results of a patient survey.丹麦某县患者选择门诊的体验:患者调查结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 10;11:262. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-262.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of factors influencing the choice for a centre for obstetrical and gynaecological patients.影响妇产科患者选择医疗中心的因素分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):3173-3181. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07841-3. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Choosing a Provider: What Factors Matter Most to Consumers and Patients?选择医疗服务提供者:哪些因素对消费者和患者最为重要?
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jan 19;9:23743735221074175. doi: 10.1177/23743735221074175. eCollection 2022.
3
Factors influencing patients' choice of clinic at Inanda, KwaZulu-Natal.影响夸祖鲁-纳塔尔因安迪纳(Inanda)诊所选择的因素。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 Sep 22;13(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2968.
4
Perspective of potential patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the minimum volume threshold for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative focus group and interview study.潜在患者对医院量效关系和全膝关节置换术最低容量阈值的看法:一项定性焦点小组和访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06641-8.
5
How do people choose to be informed? A survey of the information searched for in the choice of primary care provider in Sweden.人们如何选择获取信息?对瑞典选择初级保健提供者时所搜索信息的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06380-w.
6
Do informed consumers in Taiwan favour larger hospitals? A 10-year population-based study on differences in the selection of healthcare providers among medical professionals, their relatives and the general population.台湾知情消费者是否更喜欢大型医院?一项基于 10 年的人群研究,探讨了医疗专业人员、其亲属和普通人群在医疗服务提供者选择方面的差异。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 16;9(5):e025202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025202.

本文引用的文献

1
Which factors decided general practitioners' choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study.哪些因素决定了在可自由选择公立医院的地区,全科医生代表患者选择医院?一项问卷调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 25;12:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-126.
2
Choosing between hospitals: the influence of the experiences of other patients.在医院之间做出选择:其他患者经历的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):764-78. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12443416. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
3
The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment.当选择医院进行手术治疗时,护理质量信息的相对重要性:一项医院选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):816-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10386799.
4
Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?在比较过医院的患者中,医院绩效数据的影响是否更大?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 9;11:214. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-214.
5
The impact of patient choice of provider on equity: analysis of a patient survey.患者选择提供者对公平性的影响:一项患者调查分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16 Suppl 1:22-8. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010084.
6
Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care.选择手术医院:关注医疗质量信息的重要性。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):544-55. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357474. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
7
Consumer attitudes about health care acquired infections: a German survey on factors considered important in the choice of a hospital.消费者对医疗保健相关感染的态度:一项关于德国医院选择中重要因素的调查。
Am J Med Qual. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):56-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860607310915.
8
Is greater patient choice consistent with equity? The case of the English NHS.患者更多的选择是否与公平性相一致?以英国国民医疗服务体系为例。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Jul;11(3):162-6. doi: 10.1258/135581906777641668.
9
Reform strategies for the English NHS.英国国民医疗服务体系的改革策略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun;23(3):37-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.37.
10
Patients choosing their hospital.患者选择他们的医院。
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):407-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.407.

患者在医疗保健选择方面的信息需求是否会因其社会人口特征而有所不同?

Do patients' information requirements for choice in health care vary with their socio-demographic characteristics?

作者信息

Laverty Anthony A, Dixon Anna, Millett Christopher

机构信息

Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

King's Fund, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1127-38. doi: 10.1111/hex.12086. Epub 2013 May 28.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12086
PMID:23711113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060873/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examines whether the information used to inform hospital choice, and the sources of that information, varies with patients' socio-demographic characteristics. It also examines whether information used by patients to inform choice is associated with attending their local hospital.

METHODS

A survey of 1033 patients who were offered a choice of hospital provider for elective treatment in England. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between patient characteristics and information used to inform choice of a hospital provider and sources of information used.

RESULTS

Factors most important to patients in choosing a hospital were quality of care, cleanliness, standard of facilities and reputation. While quality of care and related factors are important to the majority of patients, those with lower levels of education were more likely to report that location and appointment times were important. Those who thought quality important were more likely to attend their local hospital provider. The main sources of information used to inform choice of hospital were own experience, family and friends and the general practitioner (GP). Patients who sought advice from their GP or booking advisors were less likely to attend their local hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences among patients as to what factors are important when choosing a hospital provider and what information and support they access suggest there needs to be a variety of information sources and support available to promote choice. Greater shared decision making through active involvement and support by GPs or booking advisors may be required if they are to make choices in line with their preferences.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨用于指导医院选择的信息及其来源是否因患者的社会人口学特征而异。同时研究患者用于指导选择的信息是否与就诊于当地医院有关。

方法

对1033名在英格兰可选择医院进行择期治疗的患者进行调查。采用逻辑回归分析来研究患者特征与用于指导医院选择的信息及信息来源之间的关联。

结果

患者选择医院时最重要的因素是医疗质量、清洁程度、设施标准和声誉。虽然医疗质量及相关因素对大多数患者很重要,但教育程度较低的患者更有可能表示地理位置和预约时间很重要。认为质量重要的患者更有可能就诊于当地医院。用于指导医院选择的主要信息来源是自身经历、家人和朋友以及全科医生(GP)。向全科医生或预约顾问寻求建议的患者就诊于当地医院的可能性较小。

结论

患者在选择医院时认为重要的因素以及他们获取的信息和支持存在差异,这表明需要有多种信息来源和支持以促进选择。如果患者要根据自己的偏好做出选择,可能需要全科医生或预约顾问通过积极参与和支持来进行更多的共同决策。