Greatrex-White Sheila, Moxey Helen
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Haematology and Oncology Day Treatment Unit, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Int Wound J. 2015 Jun;12(3):293-301. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12100. Epub 2013 May 28.
The purpose of this study was to ascertain how well different wound assessment tools meet the needs of nurses in carrying out general wound assessment and whether current tools are fit for purpose. The methodology employed was evaluation research. In order to conduct the evaluation, a literature review was undertaken to identify the criteria of an optimal wound assessment tool which would meet nurses' needs. Several freely available wound assessment tools were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and an audit tool was developed to evaluate the selected tools based on how well they met the criteria of the optimal wound assessment tool. The results provide a measure of how well the selected wound assessment tools meet the criteria of the optimal wound assessment tool. No tool was identified which fulfilled all the criteria, but two (the Applied Wound Management tool and the National Wound Assessment Form) met the most criteria of the optimal tool and were therefore considered to best meet nurses' needs in wound assessment. The study provides a mechanism for the appraisal of wound assessment tools using a set of optimal criteria which could aid practitioners in their search for the best wound assessment tool.
本研究的目的是确定不同的伤口评估工具在满足护士进行一般伤口评估需求方面的效果如何,以及当前的工具是否适用。所采用的方法是评估研究。为了进行评估,开展了一项文献综述,以确定能够满足护士需求的最佳伤口评估工具的标准。根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准,选择了几种免费的伤口评估工具,并开发了一种审核工具,根据所选工具满足最佳伤口评估工具标准的程度来评估它们。结果提供了所选伤口评估工具满足最佳伤口评估工具标准程度的一种衡量。没有发现一种工具能满足所有标准,但有两种工具(应用伤口管理工具和国家伤口评估表)满足了最佳工具的大多数标准,因此被认为最能满足护士在伤口评估方面的需求。该研究提供了一种机制,可利用一套最佳标准对伤口评估工具进行评估,这有助于从业者寻找最佳的伤口评估工具。