Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.043. Epub 2013 May 7.
Perineural invasion is discussed as a significant route of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer (PCa). Recent in vitro studies suggested a complex mechanism of neuroepithelial interaction.
The present study was intended to investigate whether the concept of neuroepithelial interaction can be supported by a quantitative analysis and planimetry of capsular nerves in relation to adjacent PCa foci.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Whole-mount sections of the prostate were created from patients undergoing non-nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. For each prostate, adjacent sections were created and stained both to identify capsular nerves (S100) and to localize cancer foci (hematoxylin and eosin).
Computerized quantification and planimetry of capsular nerves (ImageJ software) were performed after applying a digital grid to define 12 capsular sectors. For statistical analyses, mixed linear models were calculated using the SAS 9.3 software package.
Specimens of 33 prostates were investigated. A total of 1957 capsular nerves and a total capsular nerve surface area of 26.44 mm(2) were measured. The major proportion was found in the dorsolateral (DL) region (p<0.001). Adjacent tumor was associated with a statistically significant higher capsular nerve count compared with the capsules of tumor-free sectors (p<0.005). Similar results were shown for capsular nerve surface area (p<0.006). Subsequent post hoc analyses at the sector level revealed that the effect of tumor on capsular nerve count or nerve surface area is most pronounced in the DL region.
The presence of PCa foci resulted in a significantly increased capsular nerve count and capsular nerve surface area compared with tumor-free sectors. The present study supports former in vitro findings suggesting that the presence of PCa lesions may lead to complex neuroepithelial interactions resulting in PCa-induced nerve growth.
神经周围侵犯被认为是前列腺癌(PCa)前列腺外延伸的重要途径。最近的体外研究表明了一种复杂的神经上皮相互作用机制。
本研究旨在通过对包膜神经与相邻 PCa 病灶的定量分析和描绘,探讨神经上皮相互作用的概念是否成立。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究从接受非神经保留腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的患者中获得前列腺全层切片。为了每例前列腺,都制作了相邻切片,用 S100 来识别包膜神经,用苏木精和伊红来定位癌灶。
在对 12 个包膜神经区域进行数字化网格定义后,使用 ImageJ 软件对包膜神经进行计算机定量和描绘。使用 SAS 9.3 软件包计算混合线性模型以进行统计分析。
研究了 33 例前列腺标本。共测量了 1957 条包膜神经和 26.44mm²的包膜神经总面积。大部分位于背外侧(DL)区域(p<0.001)。与无肿瘤区域的包膜相比,相邻肿瘤的包膜神经计数明显更高(p<0.005)。包膜神经表面积也显示出相似的结果(p<0.006)。在区域水平上进行的后续事后分析显示,肿瘤对包膜神经计数或神经表面积的影响在 DL 区域最为显著。
与无肿瘤区域相比,PCa 病灶的存在导致包膜神经计数和包膜神经表面积显著增加。本研究支持了先前的体外研究结果,即 PCa 病变的存在可能导致复杂的神经上皮相互作用,导致 PCa 诱导的神经生长。