Glick Shimon M
Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits Center for Jewish Medical Ethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel.
Harefuah. 2013 Mar;152(3):129-31, 184.
Recently, there have been efforts in a number of countries to forbid the circumcision of infants and children. This position, which is based on alleged violation of autonomy and on serious harm to the infant or child, is not supported by the medical literature. Controlled studies have accumulated showing the major health benefits of circumcision of infants; there is a decrease in urinary tract infections, a virtual elimination of cancer of the penis, a reduction in HIV and HPV infections, as well as other sexually transmitted diseases, and perhaps, reductions in prostatic cancer and in uterine cervical cancer. The complications of the procedure are minimal, especially when performed in infancy. Recent studies have not confirmed the alleged reduction in sexual pleasure as a result of circumcision. Therefore, there is no justification, whatsoever, for attempts to forbid circumcision of infants. On the contrary, there seem to be good reasons to encourage such practices.
最近,一些国家已在努力禁止对婴幼儿进行包皮环切术。这一立场基于所谓的对自主权的侵犯以及对婴幼儿的严重伤害,但医学文献并不支持这一立场。越来越多的对照研究表明,对婴儿进行包皮环切术对健康有诸多益处;尿路感染减少,阴茎癌几乎消除,艾滋病毒和人乳头瘤病毒感染以及其他性传播疾病的感染率降低,或许前列腺癌和子宫颈癌的发病率也会降低。该手术的并发症极少,尤其是在婴儿期进行时。最近的研究并未证实所谓的包皮环切术会导致性快感降低。因此,试图禁止对婴儿进行包皮环切术毫无道理可言。相反,似乎有充分理由鼓励这种做法。