Volavka J, Cooper T B, Meisner M, Bitter I, Czobor P, Jaeger J
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1990;26(1):13-7.
To test the hypothesis of a "therapeutic window," we have randomly assigned acutely exacerbating schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients to one of three plasma levels of haloperidol (HAL): 2-13, 13.1-24, or 24.1-35 ng/ml. Patients who did not improve after 6 weeks of this treatment were randomly assigned to one of the three haloperidol levels for another 6 weeks. The improvement was defined as at least 50 percent reduction of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score. The results obtained in 111 patients do not support any consistent relationship between plasma level of haloperidol and clinical improvement. Patients in the high haloperidol plasma range tended to have more side effects. These results suggest that the haloperidol doses used in clinical practice may be higher than necessary.
为验证“治疗窗”假说,我们将急性加重的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者随机分为三组,使其血浆中氟哌啶醇(HAL)水平分别维持在2 - 13、13.1 - 24或24.1 - 35 ng/ml。接受该治疗6周后未改善的患者,再随机分配至上述三种氟哌啶醇水平之一,继续治疗6周。改善的定义为简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)总分至少降低50%。111例患者的研究结果不支持氟哌啶醇血浆水平与临床改善之间存在任何一致的关系。氟哌啶醇血浆水平高的患者往往有更多副作用。这些结果表明,临床实践中使用的氟哌啶醇剂量可能高于必要剂量。