iMAH Hematology Associates, New Hyde Park, New York, NY 11040, USA.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2013 Jun;27(3):565-84. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2013.02.006.
Since the last review in 2007 of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia in the Clinics, further understanding of the nature of TTP and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) has led to increasing use of rituximab in the treatment of TTP and the approval in 2011 of eculizumab for the treatment of aHUS. With this new armamentarium, distinction of aHUS from TTP has become more critical than ever. This article updates the new knowledge, highlights the difference between aHUS and TTP, and presents a scheme for their diagnosis and management.
自 2007 年《诊所》(Clinics)上一篇关于血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)和微血管性溶血性贫血的综述以来,人们对 TTP 和非典型溶血尿毒综合征(aHUS)本质的进一步认识,导致利妥昔单抗在 TTP 治疗中的应用日益增多,依库珠单抗于 2011 年也被批准用于 aHUS 的治疗。有了这些新的治疗方法,aHUS 与 TTP 的区分比以往任何时候都更加重要。本文更新了新知识,重点介绍了 aHUS 和 TTP 之间的差异,并提出了它们的诊断和治疗方案。