Centro de Salud Santa Ponsa, Baleares, Spain,
Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;172(10):1411-3. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2052-1. Epub 2013 May 29.
Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are one of the mainstays of treatment for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The most important disadvantage of IACI is the pain associated with the procedure. Little is known about the children or parents' perception of this pain. This study was undertaken to determine whether patients and their parents prefer sedation to receive IACI or not and why. A survey form was presented to patients and/or their parents from January to March 2010 to evaluate their choice of anesthesiologist-controlled deep sedation (with sevoflurane) vs. no sedation-no local anesthesia and the reasons for it. All participants had experienced the two options. In addition, there were two visual analog scales (VAS) to evaluate pain associated with blood draws and IACI, respectively. A total of 45 patients and their parents filled out the survey form. There were 34 females; the median age was 10.6 years, and the median duration of the disease was 6.4 years. Median VAS score was 1.3 for pain associated with blood draws, and 6, for IACI. Most children preferred sedation for IACI (26 vs. 15), although four did not show preference for either method. Children who preferred sedation for IACI were younger (p = 0.03) and had a shorter course of disease (p = 0.04).
While most children prefer to receive IACI under sedation, a majority of parents prefer to avoid its risks. Children who prefer IACI without sedation are significantly older and have a longer course of disease.
关节内皮质类固醇注射(IACI)是治疗儿童幼年特发性关节炎的主要方法之一。IACI 最重要的缺点是与该程序相关的疼痛。对于儿童或父母对这种疼痛的感知,知之甚少。本研究旨在确定患者及其父母是否愿意接受镇静以接受 IACI,以及原因。2010 年 1 月至 3 月,向患者及其父母(或父母)提供了一份调查问卷,以评估他们对麻醉师控制下的深度镇静(七氟醚)与无镇静-无局部麻醉的选择以及选择的原因。所有参与者都体验过这两种选择。此外,还有两个视觉模拟量表(VAS)分别评估与采血和 IACI 相关的疼痛。共有 45 名患者及其父母填写了调查问卷。其中有 34 名女性;中位年龄为 10.6 岁,疾病中位持续时间为 6.4 年。与采血相关的疼痛的中位数 VAS 评分为 1.3,与 IACI 相关的疼痛的中位数 VAS 评分为 6。大多数儿童更喜欢在 IACI 时接受镇静(26 对 15),尽管有 4 名儿童对这两种方法均无偏好。更喜欢在 IACI 时接受镇静的儿童年龄较小(p = 0.03),疾病病程较短(p = 0.04)。
虽然大多数儿童更喜欢在镇静下接受 IACI,但大多数父母更愿意避免其风险。更喜欢在没有镇静的情况下接受 IACI 的儿童年龄明显更大,且疾病病程更长。