Suppr超能文献

预测住院患者QT间期延长风险评分的开发与验证

Development and validation of a risk score to predict QT interval prolongation in hospitalized patients.

作者信息

Tisdale James E, Jaynes Heather A, Kingery Joanna R, Mourad Noha A, Trujillo Tate N, Overholser Brian R, Kovacs Richard J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):479-87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000152. Epub 2013 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying hospitalized patients at risk for QT interval prolongation could lead to interventions to reduce the risk of torsades de pointes. Our objective was to develop and validate a risk score for QT prolongation in hospitalized patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, in a single tertiary care institution, consecutive patients (n=900) admitted to cardiac care units comprised the risk score development group. The score was then applied to 300 additional patients in a validation group. Corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation (defined as QTc>500 ms or an increase of >60 ms from baseline) occurred in 274 (30.4%) and 90 (30.0%) patients in the development group and validation group, respectively. Independent predictors of QTc prolongation included the following: female (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.0), diagnosis of myocardial infarction (2.4 [1.6-3.9]), septic shock (2.7 [1.5-4.8]), left ventricular dysfunction (2.7 [1.6-5.0]), administration of a QT-prolonging drug (2.8 [2.0-4.0]), ≥2 QT-prolonging drugs (2.6 [1.9-5.6]), or loop diuretic (1.4 [1.0-2.0]), age >68 years (1.3 [1.0-1.9]), serum K⁺ <3.5 mEq/L (2.1 [1.5-2.9]), and admitting QTc >450 ms (2.3; confidence interval [1.6-3.2]). Risk scores were developed by assigning points based on log odds ratios. Low-, moderate-, and high-risk ranges of 0 to 6, 7 to 10, and 11 to 21 points, respectively, best predicted QTc prolongation (C statistic=0.823). A high-risk score ≥11 was associated with sensitivity=0.74, specificity=0.77, positive predictive value=0.79, and negative predictive value=0.76. In the validation group, the incidences of QTc prolongation were 15% (low risk); 37% (moderate risk); and 73% (high risk).

CONCLUSIONS

A risk score using easily obtainable clinical variables predicts patients at highest risk for QTc interval prolongation and may be useful in guiding monitoring and treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

识别有QT间期延长风险的住院患者可促使采取干预措施以降低尖端扭转型室速的风险。我们的目标是制定并验证住院患者QT延长的风险评分。

方法与结果

在本研究中,在一家三级医疗机构,入住心脏监护病房的连续患者(n = 900)组成风险评分开发组。然后将该评分应用于另外300名验证组患者。校正QT(QTc)间期延长(定义为QTc>500 ms或较基线增加>60 ms)分别在开发组和验证组的274例(30.4%)和90例(30.0%)患者中出现。QTc延长的独立预测因素包括:女性(比值比,1.5;95%置信区间,1.1 - 2.0)、心肌梗死诊断(2.4 [1.6 - 3.9])、感染性休克(2.7 [1.5 - 4.8])、左心室功能不全(2.7 [1.6 - 5.0])、使用延长QT的药物(2.8 [2.0 - 4.0])、≥2种延长QT的药物(2.6 [1.9 - 5.6])或袢利尿剂(1.4 [1.0 - 2.0])、年龄>68岁(1.3 [1.0 - 1.9])、血清钾<3.5 mEq/L(2.1 [1.5 - 2.9])以及入院时QTc>450 ms(2.3;置信区间[1.6 - 3.2])。根据对数比值比分配分数来制定风险评分。低、中、高风险范围分别为0至6分、7至10分和11至21分,最能预测QTc延长(C统计量 = 0.823)。高风险评分≥11分的敏感度为0.74,特异度为0.77,阳性预测值为0.79,阴性预测值为0.76。在验证组中,QTc延长的发生率分别为15%(低风险);37%(中风险);73%(高风险)。

结论

使用易于获取的临床变量的风险评分可预测QT间期延长风险最高的患者,可能有助于指导监测和治疗决策。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验