Almeida e Silva Júnio S, Erdelt Kurt, Edelhoff Daniel, Araújo Élito, Stimmelmayr Michael, Vieira Luiz Clovis Cardoso, Güth Jan-Frederik
Department of Operative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Av. Universitária Qd. 60, Lt. 08. Residencial Macedônia, Torre 1, apt. 1004, Santa Isabel, Anapólis, Goiás, Brazil, 75083350,
Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):515-23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2. Epub 2013 May 29.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-generated four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses made with digital and conventional impressions.
A titanium master model was used. For group conventional impression (CI), 12 polyether impressions of the master model with Impregum(TM) were made. For group digital impression (DI), 12 digital impressions of the master model using Lava(TM) C.O.S. system were made. The replica technique was applied. The Mann-Whitney U statistical test was applied to detect statistical differences between the groups, in terms of marginal and internal fit. Face-by-face comparisons between groups were also carried out.
Groups DI and CI presented mean marginal fit of 63.96 and 65.33 μm, respectively, and showed no statistically significant difference. Groups DI and CI presented significantly different internal fit with mean values of 58.46 and 65.94 μm, respectively. Group DI showed statistically significantly lower values for marginal and internal fit on premolar mesial face, and on molar distal and palatal faces.
Frameworks fabricated from digital and conventional impressions showed clinically acceptable marginal fit. Frameworks fabricated from digital impression demonstrated better internal fit than ones fabricated from conventional impression. Reviewing each retainer face, digital impression showed better marginal and internal fit at the premolar mesial and molar distal faces.
The results of this in vitro study show that digital impressions made with the Lava(TM) C.O.S. system and its digital workflow are suitable for fabricating four-unit zirconia frameworks, with regard to marginal and internal fit requirements.
本体外研究旨在评估采用数字印模和传统印模制作的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)四单位氧化锆固定义齿的边缘适合性和内部适合性。
使用钛制主模型。对于传统印模组(CI),采用藻酸盐印模材料对主模型制作12个聚醚印模。对于数字印模组(DI),使用Lava(TM)C.O.S.系统对主模型制作12个数字印模。应用复制技术。采用曼-惠特尼U检验来检测两组在边缘适合性和内部适合性方面的统计学差异。同时也对两组进行了面对面比较。
DI组和CI组的平均边缘适合性分别为63.96μm和65.33μm,无统计学显著差异。DI组和CI组的内部适合性有显著差异,平均值分别为58.46μm和65.94μm。DI组在前磨牙近中面、磨牙远中面和腭面的边缘适合性和内部适合性在统计学上显著更低。
由数字印模和传统印模制作的支架显示出临床上可接受的边缘适合性。由数字印模制作的支架比由传统印模制作的支架具有更好的内部适合性。查看每个固位体表面,数字印模在前磨牙近中面和磨牙远中面显示出更好的边缘适合性和内部适合性。
本体外研究结果表明,就边缘适合性和内部适合性要求而言,使用Lava(TM)C.O.S.系统制作的数字印模及其数字工作流程适用于制作四单位氧化锆支架。