Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;787:193-201. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_22.
Room reverberation usually degrades speech reception, such as when listeners identify test words from a 'sir'-to-'stir' continuum. Here, substantial reverberation introduces a 'tail' from the [s], which tends to fill the gap that cues the [t], and a degradation effect arises as listeners report correspondingly fewer 'stir' sounds. This effect is particularly clear when test words are preceded by a precursor phrase (e.g. 'next you'll get…') that contains much less reverberation than the test word. When the precursor's reverberation is increased to be the same as in the test word, the degradation diminishes as more 'stir' sounds are heard once again. This last effect has been attributed to a perceptual compensation mechanism that is informed by the precursor's reverberation level. However, a recent claim is that the degradation is caused by 'modulation masking' from precursors with a low level of reverberation. Such masking is likely to diminish when the precursor's reverberation level is raised, because reverberation acts as a low-pass modulation filter. Support for this hypothesis comes from results in conditions where degradation effects seem to be entirely absent, despite substantial reverberation. In these conditions, test words were played in isolation, with no precursor, and reverberation was kept at the same level in the test words of every trial. The experiments reported here have conditions that are similar, except that reverberation in test words is varied unpredictably from trial to trial, so that substantial-level trials are interspersed with trials that have a much lower level of reverberation. The result is that under these conditions, the degradation effect is entirely restored, allowing rejection of the modulation-masking hypothesis. An alternative is that some perceptual compensation comes from reverberation information within test words, and its effects accumulate over sequences of trials as long as the test word's reverberation level stays the same from trial to trial.
房间混响通常会降低语音的可懂度,例如当听者从“sir”-to-“stir”连续体中识别测试词时。在这里,大量的混响会引入一个来自[s]的“尾巴”,它往往会填补提示[t]的间隙,从而产生一个听者报告的“stir”声音相应减少的降级效应。当测试词前面有一个前导短语(例如“接下来你会得到……”)时,这种效果尤其明显,前导短语的混响比测试词少得多。当前导的混响增加到与测试词相同的水平时,随着再次听到更多的“stir”声音,这种降级效应会减小。最后一种效果归因于一种感知补偿机制,该机制由前导的混响水平提供信息。然而,最近有人声称,这种降级是由低混响水平的前导引起的“调制掩蔽”造成的。当前导的混响水平提高时,这种掩蔽可能会减小,因为混响充当了一个低通调制滤波器。支持该假说的证据来自于这样一种情况:尽管存在大量混响,但似乎完全不存在降级效应。在这些情况下,测试词是单独播放的,没有前导,并且在每个试验中,测试词的混响水平保持不变。这里报告的实验具有相似的条件,除了测试词中的混响在试验中是不可预测地变化的,以至于高水平试验与混响水平低得多的试验交错出现。结果是,在这些条件下,降级效应完全恢复,从而拒绝了调制掩蔽假说。另一种选择是,一些感知补偿来自测试词中的混响信息,并且其效果会随着试验序列的累积而累积,只要测试词的混响水平在每个试验中保持不变。