Nielsen Jens Bo, Dau Torsten
Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3088-94. doi: 10.1121/1.3494508.
Listeners were given the task to identify the stop-consonant [t] in the test-word "stir" when the word was embedded in a carrier sentence. Reverberation was added to the test-word, but not to the carrier, and the ability to identify the [t] decreased because the amplitude modulations associated with the [t] were smeared. When a similar amount of reverberation was also added to the carrier sentence, the listeners' ability to identify the stop-consonant was restored. This phenomenon has in previous research been considered as evidence for an extrinsic compensation mechanism for reverberation in the human auditory system [Watkins (2005). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 249-262]. In the present study, the reverberant test-word was embedded in additional non-reverberant carriers, such as white noise, speech-shaped noise and amplitude modulated noise. In addition, a reference condition was included where the test-word was presented in isolation, i.e., without any carrier stimulus. In all of these conditions, the ability to identify the stop-consonant [t] was enhanced relative to the condition using the non-reverberant speech carrier. The results suggest that the non-reverberant speech carrier produces an interference effect that impedes the identification of the stop-consonant. These findings raise doubts about the existence of the compensation mechanism.
当测试词“stir”嵌入到一个载体句子中时,听众被要求识别该测试词中的塞音[t]。混响被添加到测试词中,但没有添加到载体句子中,由于与[t]相关的幅度调制被模糊,识别[t]的能力下降。当向载体句子中也添加类似量的混响时,听众识别塞音的能力得以恢复。在先前的研究中,这种现象被认为是人类听觉系统中混响的一种外在补偿机制的证据[沃特金斯(2005年)。《美国声学学会杂志》118,249 - 262]。在本研究中,有混响的测试词被嵌入到额外的无混响载体中,如白噪声、语音形状噪声和调幅噪声。此外,还包括一个参考条件,即测试词单独呈现,也就是没有任何载体刺激。在所有这些条件下,相对于使用无混响语音载体的条件,识别塞音[t]的能力都有所提高。结果表明,无混响语音载体产生了一种干扰效应,阻碍了塞音的识别。这些发现对补偿机制的存在提出了质疑。