• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反流与动态反流监测期间症状的关系:现有方法的优缺点。

Association between reflux and symptoms during ambulatory reflux monitoring: pros and cons of existing methods.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Aug;25(8):633-7. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12164. Epub 2013 May 30.

DOI:10.1111/nmo.12164
PMID:23718322
Abstract

Ambulatory reflux monitoring provides information on the quantity of gastroesophageal reflux and, if symptoms are registered during the study, provides insights into the relation between symptoms and reflux. Several symptom-reflux association analysis indices have been developed to express the relationship between onset of symptom and reflux in a numerical way. One of these indices is the binomial symptom index, introduced by Ghillebert et al. in 1990. The binomial symptom index can be used to study the relationship between symptoms and acid reflux. In this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility Barriga-Rivera et al. describe the use of Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the effect of random changes in reflux rates and symptom occurrences on binomial symptom index outcome. Their analysis shows that this index can be used to measure the strength of reflux symptom association. Performing symptom-reflux association analysis is important as the outcome has been shown to be reproducible and can be used as a predictor to response to acid-suppressive treatment. Despite some limitations, use of symptom-reflux association analysis is a valuable clinical tool that can provide unique insights into the cause of a patient's symptoms.

摘要

动态反流监测可提供胃食管反流的数量信息,如果在研究过程中记录到症状,则可深入了解症状与反流之间的关系。已经开发出了几种症状-反流关联分析指标,以数值方式表达症状与反流之间的关系。其中一个指标是由 Ghillebert 等人于 1990 年引入的二项式症状指数。二项式症状指数可用于研究症状与酸反流之间的关系。在本期《神经胃肠病学和动力》中,Barriga-Rivera 等人描述了使用蒙特卡罗模拟来研究反流率和症状发生的随机变化对二项式症状指数结果的影响。他们的分析表明,该指数可用于衡量反流症状关联的强度。进行症状-反流关联分析很重要,因为研究结果表明其具有可重复性,并且可用作酸抑制治疗反应的预测指标。尽管存在一些局限性,但症状-反流关联分析的使用是一种有价值的临床工具,可以提供对患者症状病因的独特见解。

相似文献

1
Association between reflux and symptoms during ambulatory reflux monitoring: pros and cons of existing methods.反流与动态反流监测期间症状的关系:现有方法的优缺点。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Aug;25(8):633-7. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12164. Epub 2013 May 30.
2
The binomial symptom index: toward an optimal method for the evaluation of symptom association in gastroesophageal reflux.二项症状指数:评估胃食管反流症状关联的最佳方法
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Aug;25(8):664-9. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12143. Epub 2013 May 3.
3
Reproducibility of symptom association analysis in ambulatory reflux monitoring.动态反流监测中症状关联分析的可重复性
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep;103(9):2200-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02067.x. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
4
The Role of Symptom Association Analysis in Gastroesophageal Reflux Testing.症状关联分析在胃食管反流测试中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;115(12):1950-1959. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000754.
5
Symptom reports are not reliable during ambulatory reflux monitoring.症状报告在动态反流监测期间不可靠。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1826-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.342. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
6
24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.24 小时与 48 小时 Bravo pH 监测。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;46(3):197-200. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822f3c4f.
7
Addition of esophageal impedance monitoring to pH monitoring increases the yield of symptom association analysis in patients off PPI therapy.在接受质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的患者中,将食管阻抗监测添加到pH监测中可提高症状关联分析的检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):453-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00427.x. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
8
[The binomial symptom index for the evaluation of temporal association between cardiorespiratory symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux in neonates].[用于评估新生儿心肺症状与胃食管反流之间时间关联的二项式症状指数]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2016 Nov;85(5):232-239. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2015.09.024. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring in patients with persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: testing while on therapy identifies the need for more aggressive anti-reflux therapy.持续性胃食管反流病症状患者的长时间动态pH监测:治疗期间进行检测可确定是否需要更积极的抗反流治疗。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Oct;91(10):2110-3.
10
Assessment of concordance of symptom reflux association tests in ambulatory pH monitoring.胃食管反流症状关联测试在动态 pH 监测中的一致性评估。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 May;35(9):1080-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05066.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic yield of ambulatory oesophageal studies on versus off proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂使用与停用情况下动态食管研究的诊断率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Nov;6(9):1294-1306. doi: 10.1177/2050640618772787. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
2
Impairment of chemical clearance and mucosal integrity distinguishes hypersensitive esophagus from functional heartburn.化学清除功能和黏膜完整性受损将高敏性食管与功能性烧心区分开来。
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;52(4):444-451. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1226-9. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
Not all anti-reflux treatment failures are due to persistence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure.
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1382-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3291-y. Epub 2013 Oct 26.